Mamdani Useful in Exposing Democrats’ ‘Commonsense Gun Safety’ Lie and More

You get what you vote for. Good and hard. And some want it gooder and harder. [More]

Why are the so-called “gun safety groups” afraid to be associated with this anti-gun “Democrat”? Why not ask them?

Kapos 2.0

We are NYC rabbis who support Zohran Mamdani – Here’s why [More]

History repeats itself:

The Mensheviks enjoyed a lot of support among the Jews—among two classes of Jews, that is. Martov and a large number of the Menshevik leaders—most of them—were classic representatives of the intelligentsia of Old Russia in its Jewish version, who perhaps knew Yiddish and did not renounce their Jewish identity, but thought of themselves as internationalists.

That was useful. Until it wasn’t.

[Via bondmen]

Mamdanis Demand Retraction

NY Times Felt Need To Explain Its Mildly Critical Piece on Zohran Mamdani – “That’s a lot of words to say you accidentally did a journalism and now you’re sad about it because it might hurt the commie.” [More]

I’ll be working on a piece this week with some observations I don’t see any “real reporters” (or even prominent “gunfluencers”) making.

[Via Michael G]

An Honest Politician

He argued that citizens’ ability to defend themselves may be compromised as well, pointing to a tweet from Mamdani saying, “We need to ban all guns.” [More]

See, none of this “commonsense gun safety law” crap, just a straight up admission of what he really wants to do

And what he’s done here is taken the “I respect the Second Amendment BUT” lie away from every politician who has endorsed him, as well as the Democrat party as a whole. I don’t see any Moms Demand or Giffords posters yet, but I dare them to back him, because that will take the lie away from them, too.

Hey, if New Yorkers elect him and the Muslims carry out another mass casualty event, what will my obligation be to consider it an attack on America warranting a response I support? Actually, I’m not sure what it is now…

Verified by MonsterInsights