Yet another scientific body has debunked bitemark analysis. The courts still won’t care. [More]
Next, you’re going to tell me most of what I see on CSI and all its spinoffs is agenda-driven BS intended to bolster a public belief in the infallibility of state enforcers…
[Via Michael G]
Most “forensic science” accuracy is predicated on the training skill and experience of those involved. Even fingerprint identification is subjective. But NOTHING is as full of BS as the rubber chicken witch doctor field of “forensic odontology”.
I disagree. “Forensic odontology” takes a backseat to “forensic psychology” and “polygraphical analysis”.
But it is another “quack” field that has no rightful place in courts of law.