Category: “settled science”

Infectious AND Antidemocratic!

Guns, in other words, are not just threats to public health; they are threats, as historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat writes, to the “strong civic culture and a public sphere conducive to social trust and altruism” that healthy democracies require. [More]

He starts with a faulty premise and goes downhill from there.

Aaron Zelman had a term for such as Metzl and Ben-Ghiat.

[Via Jess]

A Nation of Test Subjects

After a four-week “screen fast” prescribed by Dr. Dunckley, which eliminated all TVs, phones, and video games, Billy’s problems miraculously cleared up. [More]

The world is one big laboratory, with no one experimenting for short and long term effects.

I wonder if this is related.

Funny, what they do require impact studies for…

[Via bondmen]

Meanwhile, Across the Pond…

Hospitals in the United Kingdom have begun using the term “chestfeeding” instead of “breastfeeding,” just years after U.S. academics published a study in which they argued that the promotion of breastfeeding as the “natural” way to feed a child has many negative societal effects. [More]

Talk about milking something for all it’s worth…

What they’re really going for is actualizing an obscene Mr. Natural feeeding a baby underground comic from 50 years ago (and you’ll either know what I’m talking about or you won’t, but I ain’t linking).

I wonder if they think this will make all those “refugees” more or less bold about taking over…

Incompetent ‘Contagious Disease’ Diagnosis for Guns a Prescription for Tyranny

So, if someone else does it you can catch it? What’s the agent of transmission, and how does it enter the body? Can we vaccinate against it? [More]

If what they say is true, shouldn’t we all be wearing face diapers or something?

Rise of the Machines

If researchers can work this out, they could someday create a cyborg brain vastly more powerful than our own. [More]

Then why should it put up with any of our $h!+?

And how do “they” propose to contain it? Remember… it’s smarter than them.

Where in nature does the superior subordinate itself to the inferior?

And yeah, this IS unnatural.

It’s Exactly Where I Might Think, You Charlatans

Gun violence in America is really bad but not where you might think [More]

I wnet through the MSN clickbait slide show so you don’t have to. Basically, agenda “scientists” are trying to convince us that small town America is more dangerous than Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore, etc., using rates.

Here’s the trick: Earlier this year we had a muderer in my home town of Hudson that looks like it could have been averted with some basic judgment about who you welcome into your home and why.

Hudson has a population of around 20,000, making the “gun homicide” rate for 2023 around five per 100,000.

Now look at the overall (not just gun) homicide rate for a significant chunk of Chicago:

The homicide rate for the city’s four North Side police districts (the 18th, 19th, 20th and 24th) last year was 3.2 residents per 100,000, according to analysis of data from the University of Chicago Crime Lab…

What this does is make it look like states with “lax gun laws” are more dangerous in general, to then push the rights swindle narrative that blanket citizen disarmament is needed. The DSM then dutifully regurgitates and parrots. It deliberately diverts attention from the documented reality that violence, as a whole, is predominantly concentrated in small, known, Democrat prohibitionist-controlled areas.

Pregnant Pause

Firearms fallout: Study says pregnant women who lived through D.C. sniper trauma had complications [More]

Way to lay the blame on the Bushmaster instead of on the sick f***s on a killing spree. Shame on whoever wrote and approved that headline. And on the “real reporter” who unquestioningly parroted conclusions…

I’d expect it from citizen disarmament agenda pushers masking as “social scientists,” but the “conservative” Washington Times ought to know better.

And as I recall, much of the public hysteria followed Moosehead living up to his name.

Funny, how the politicans who will exploit this will all have Planned Parenthood endorsements.

[Via Steven H]

Wearing a Target

Texas AG Ken Paxton sues Pfizer for vaccine efficacy misrepresentation, ‘conspiring to censor the vaccine’s critics’ [More]

I’d like to see the short list for plans being evaluated to destroy him, and know where the final approval will come from.

I’ve never talked about this before but for some reason it seems tangentially relevant: Back in an earlier life when I was the plant manager for a pharmaceutical company, I got a commendation from Pfizer for a successful national product launch, along with a not-so-subtle dig at corporate for almost derailing things. Just to show how coroporate politics work, that earned me some resentment among one of the higher-ups and put a target on my back.

[Via Michael G]

It’s the Lies

It’s the guns. [More]

Of course, it’s not. But you’ll notice the grabbers never tell you when meeting their demands will be enough– that’s because it never will be for them. They’re still arguing that Heller misappropriated founding intent and that you have no individual right to own a gun.

Of course, they’re talking about taking your guns. They have been since Day One, and it’s the one thing they say you can believe.

Enter “Pediatrician & Mom” Dr. Annie Andrews, Senior Advisor @everytown, who quickly establishes that she is a medical fraud:

Wait. It’s the “human heart”? So we need a cardiologist? Good news! I know many. They think it’s the fucking guns.

That’s two logic fails in one tweet, the first implication being that her premise speaks authoritatively for cardiologists, and the second relying on false authority that a medical degree in a specialized field qualifies them to have expert opinions in other fields.

There’s a word for such as Annie.

Nothing to See Here

Could I BE Any More Vaccinated? Get your shot and then get your shirt [More]

What kind of twisted anti-vaxxer would make something of that?

Remember when Rolling Stone used to pretend it was counterculture instead of a narrative parroting DSM establishment lickspittle?

Me neither.

Anyway, the answer to Matthew’s question is “No.”

Verified by MonsterInsights