David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.
View all posts by admin
6 thoughts on “You Get What You Pay For”
They had years to shift the conversation among their local Dem apparatus since the 2020 buying spree and did jack all. Let them sleep in the bed they made.
The outrage is that previous gun owners (who they gladly point out are mostly white Christian men) already have semi-auto rifles, which the new gun owners will no longer be able to get.
What I’m reading there is, they’re not angry that they won’t be able to get semi-auto rifles. They’re angry that prior owners will be allowed to keep theirs.
Regardless if that’s correct or not, that’s how the disarmament advocates they elected will interpret and try to “fix” it.
For “equality”, of course.
What a lot of people don’t get is that a previous law defined “assault weapon” as any semi.
A 1022 Ruger is an “assault weapon” according to the previous law, which I think was passed by a ballot measure just like Oregon’s measure 114.
Not to mention their legislature also passed a 10 day waiting period.
Jack, what “previous law”? Got a way to identify what, when, and where?
This link from Reason.com says it was initiative 1639 voted in by the people:
They had years to shift the conversation among their local Dem apparatus since the 2020 buying spree and did jack all. Let them sleep in the bed they made.
The outrage is that previous gun owners (who they gladly point out are mostly white Christian men) already have semi-auto rifles, which the new gun owners will no longer be able to get.
What I’m reading there is, they’re not angry that they won’t be able to get semi-auto rifles. They’re angry that prior owners will be allowed to keep theirs.
Regardless if that’s correct or not, that’s how the disarmament advocates they elected will interpret and try to “fix” it.
For “equality”, of course.
What a lot of people don’t get is that a previous law defined “assault weapon” as any semi.
A 1022 Ruger is an “assault weapon” according to the previous law, which I think was passed by a ballot measure just like Oregon’s measure 114.
Not to mention their legislature also passed a 10 day waiting period.
Jack, what “previous law”? Got a way to identify what, when, and where?
This link from Reason.com says it was initiative 1639 voted in by the people:
https://reason.com/2019/01/03/washington-redefines-all-semiautomatic-r/
So, not exactly a law enacted by the legislature.
Jack
Gotcha, thanks. Yeah, 114: https://waronguns.com/stop-114/