An Added Benefit

Why Illinois’ new assault weapons ban might not hold up in court [More]

True, but it’s not like it costs the subversives anything, and those they’re persecuting will need to spend big bucks to fight it.

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

3 thoughts on “An Added Benefit”

  1. Of course it won’t hold up under any reasonable scrutiny, but I don’t think that’s the game they are playing. If forced to remove this law they will come up with something even more convoluted and try to defend that for a couple years.

    Meanwhile they will use this to continue antagonizing any privately owned FFL dealers over selling vaguely defined “assault weapon parts.” I would be willing to bet the ISP already has plans for undercover buys of newly banned innocuous items. File charges, pass their info to the feds and the FFL gets pulled.

    It takes longer than trying to go door-to-door, but it may lead to much the same place.

      1. Exactly. I had this said to my face years ago in a custody case over some grandkids. “Go ahead and take us to court, we have deeper pockets and we’ll bankrupt you”. It’s not too difficult to understand “Screw the law, screw morality, and screw you, pissant peasant”.

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights