Ask What Your Country Can Do for Them

More Than 16,000 Immigrants in Illinois May Lose Food Assistance in the Coming Months [More]

How many generations are we gonna have to feed until they come around?

And how will they, if this is the culture they’re immersed in?

Hey, maybe they’ll riot. While waving foreign flags.

[Via Michael G]

Freedom’s Just Another Word for Nothing Left to Lose

IL Supreme Court Defends Removal of Traffic Court Judge for Past Conservative Comments – The Illinois Supreme Court would rather keep a heavy backlog of Cook County cases than allow a pro-Trump judge to sit on the traffic court. [More]

So the only judges will be collectivists? If a man knows a show trial gulty verdict is a predetermined outcome, why would he surrender to “have his day in court”? Because otherwise they’ll kill him?

If only the Framers had foreseen a remedy for such tyranny…

It’s pretty obvious the rulers know about it.

[Via Michael G]

Now Make Gun Laws Treasonous Idiot-Proof

Proposed law would require gun makers to make firearms switch-proof [More]

In other words, ban most existing semiautos. Then on to the next grab.

With an Only Ones standing army exemption, of course… not to mention Chi-Town gangs.

This is one area where “in common use” will work in our favor, but the proponents know that. They’re just in-your-face harassing and know that if they do pass this abomination, the state has unlimited tax plunder to dip into, whereas gun groups will have to once more go to shallow pocket donors for legal costs.

“They are already manufacturing guns you can’t convert”…?

This is exactly what the treasonous bastards tried to do with “smart guns” in New Jersey.

You don’t hate Illinois Nazis enough.

[Via bondmen]

You Pays Your Money and You Takes Your Chances

SCOTUS Lets Illinois Public Transit Carry Ban Stand, Leaving a Dangerous “Sensitive Places” Theory in Place [More]

Hey, none of them have to take the bus.

Remember the good old days before Democrats f_d it all up?

Defense against highwaymen in Colonial America and the early American frontier involved a combination of armed passengers, specialized weaponry, and defensive tactics, as stagecoaches were frequently targeted for mail, cash, and passenger valuables… A common weapon for guarding coaches was the blunderbuss, a short-barreled shotgun-like firearm ideal for close-quarters combat.

We’re the Only Ones Overreacting Enough

For a misdemeanor charge of possessing 38 rounds of ammo without an FOID card? This is how regimes enforce “commonsense gun safety laws”? Even those that are dominated by “law-and-order Republicans”?

Those are some heavy duty “military style” assault vehicles the standing army sheriff sent out for that. It brings to mind a question I asked some years back about how the Battle of Athens would go today.

[Via 1Gat]

Bissful Ignorance

Establishment Democrats fend off far-left influencer…Kat Abughazaleh… She lost to Daniel Biss, the mayor of Everston, Ill., and a former state lawmaker. [More]

So, someone who is running on a platform to “Repeal the Second Amendment” is considered an “establishment Democrat” and representative of what Everytown/Moms Demand consider “commonsense gun safety laws?”

Told ya.

He’s doing the Safety Dance.

There’s no giving an inch to these lying tyrant wannabes. You’d think NRA’s “A+ rated and endorsed” rated John Cornyn would understand that.

Not Just Off, But All the Way Off

Told ya it’s not just Trump.

I’ve been called a lot of names but don’t think I’ve ever been called a “crony” before.

Funny, who’s cheering him on.

[Via Michael G]

And They Say There Are No Stupid Questions

Whether Illinois’ flat ban on ordinary citizens carrying firearms on public transportation violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. [More]

That this is even in question shows how far the Republic has degraded from the clear intent understood by the founders as a condition for ratification.

That the big worry now is if SCOTUS will even hear it, and if so, how it will rule, tells us more.

[Via Jess]

Shall Not Be Infringed UNLESS…?

Viramontes’s criticism of Bevis on this point carries little weight, given Heller’s holding that “the Second Amendment does not protect those weapons not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes[.]” Id. at 625. Heller did not hold, as Viramontes seems to imply, that military-style weapons are protected “arms” because military action by civilians is lawful. Instead, Heller characterized self-defense as the “core lawful purpose” of firearm use. 554 U.S. at 630. [More]

I beg to differ. And have warned that ignoring the militia aspect would be used against us.

Funny, how a common prohibitionist argument is that 2A advocates ignore the first 13 words, and here it is they’re doing just that in their legal argument.

In any case, the amendment says “arms.” And as for the contention that its ban “finds support in this nation’s history and tradition,” tell that to Tench Coxe.

F-n’ lying Illinois Democrats…

[Via Jess]

Just Like the Founders Intended

Creates the Responsibility in Firearm Legislation (RIFL) Act. Establishes a firearms manufacturer licensing program in the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, with certain requirements, including that the sum of all fees for firearms manufacturer licenses shall be equal to the public health costs and financial burdens from firearm injuries and deaths. [More]

Skirt protections,” eh?

There’s nothing “novel’ about being Democrat punks who continue to harass even though they know this spits on the face of the SCOTUS-held text, history, and tradition standard. They know they have unlimited tax plunder resources and can drag private plaintiff efforts and expenses on for years, all with impunity, that is, no personal repercussions.

To them it’s a game of “Gotcha!”

Some of us aren’t playing.

[Via Jess]

A Groundbreaking Development

“It should come as no surprise that the Obama Center is potentially leaving Illinois taxpayers high and dry — it’s an Illinois Democrat tradition,” Salvi told Fox News Digital in a statement. “Democrats in this state, when not going to prison for corruption, treat taxpayers like a personal piggy bank giving sweetheart deals to their political benefactors.” [More]

They bury the truth and then dig their way out.

To Each According to His Needs?

COURTROOM AUDIO LIVE: AR & Mag Ban Arguments Reveal How Nefarious These Blue States Actually Are… [Watch]

You don’t need full auto because the government has it? We’re limited to “self-defense”? And only indoors? Anybody see the word “useful” in the Second Amendment…?

Are “average” <3-round limits next?

Everybody’s picking up that it’s “common usage” arguments they’re arguing to impose limits, right?

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights