
Woke Illinois gov. posed with ‘violence disruptor’ who days later ‘killed young dad-to-be while fleeing Louis Vuitton robbery’ [More]
Well, there’s another 300 pounds of ugly fat he won’t be able to lose before running for president…
[Via bondmen]
Notes from the Resistance

Woke Illinois gov. posed with ‘violence disruptor’ who days later ‘killed young dad-to-be while fleeing Louis Vuitton robbery’ [More]
Well, there’s another 300 pounds of ugly fat he won’t be able to lose before running for president…
[Via bondmen]
COURTROOM AUDIO LIVE: AR & Mag Ban Arguments Reveal How Nefarious These Blue States Actually Are… [Watch]
You don’t need full auto because the government has it? We’re limited to “self-defense”? And only indoors? Anybody see the word “useful” in the Second Amendment…?
Are “average” <3-round limits next?
Everybody’s picking up that it’s “common usage” arguments they’re arguing to impose limits, right?
[Via Jess]

Attorneys representing the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) have filed a motion for summary judgment in its lawsuit challenging Illinois law that bans firearms in homes licensed to provide foster or day care. The Foster Home and Day Care Home Rules and statutes in Illinois ban adults licensed to foster parent or provide day care in their own homes from keeping functional firearms for self-defense, even if they are otherwise allowed to possess them. [More]
Another prohibitionist paradox: How can you be a caretaker if you can’t take care?
They don’t care.
Following its amicus brief in support of us, the federal government has asked the Seventh Circuit for approval to participate in oral arguments in our lawsuit challenging Illinois’ “assault weapon” and magazine bans [More]
How could they refuse? After all, “Currently, six of the court’s judges were appointed by Republicans and five by Democrats.”
Yeah, but one of those “Republicans” is treasonous dotard Frank Easterbrook…
[Via Jess]
Illinois Lt. Governor Tweets That Michael Brown Was “Murdered” – In fact, Brown was shot when he sucker punched a cop and tried to grab his service weapon. Yet 11 years after Brown’s shooting, the lie persists and is spread by politicians and activists. [More]
The people stirring up the mob are the sane ones who demand you be defenseless against the calculated violence they incite.
[Via Michael G]

Still, the brief adds some important points that an ultimate Supreme Court decision will need to consider: Among recognized “uses by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes” are “self-defense, target shooting, and public defense,” that last category touching on the core purpose the Framers had in mind as articulated in the first 13 words of the Second Amendment. [More]
My latest from Firearms News looks at a long called for DOJ action in support of the Second Amendment that matches its new words.

There have been so many reports of CRIMINAL ANTI-GUN DEMOCRATS… that it’s fair to assume none of these people are atypical. [More]
Gun-grabbers sure seem to have a lot of “prohibited persons” in their ranks.
Gun owners in Illinois face $10K fine if weapon is stolen and used in a crime [More]
Rip ’em off twice. Brilliant.
But ex post facto will protect Chicago PD from being liable for the gun collected at a Snuffy Pfleger “buyback” and subsequently used in three shootings, right?
[Via Jess]
The Illinois House Gun Violence Prevention Committee is holding a public hearing today in Springfield on House Bill 3320, the so-called “Responsibility in Firearm Legislation (RIFL) Act, and Prairie State gun owners are encouraged to contact committee members and ask them to reject this measure. [More]
Remarkable!

If you want relief, contact your state representatives, the Democrat ones who are passing citizen disarmament edicts, and ask them not to. [More]
The bipolarity will continue until such time as gun owner advocates have a seat at the decision-making table.
Critic of embattled Dolton, Illinois mayor sees business destroyed by ‘suspicious’ fire: officials [More]
Breakfast at Tiffany’s…
If you want to know what kind of people elected her, just know that “Dolton” is what we’d call an aptronym.
[Via Michael G]
The Appellate Court for the 4th District in Illinois has ruled against the Second Amendment, deciding that Gun Owner FOID ID laws are constitutional. [Watch]
I’d say something about this, but I don’t have a state-approved speech ID card.
Besides, I thought permits were a “remedy.”
[Via Jess]
Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin retiring, will not run for reelection in 2026 at end of term [More]
Illinoi voted for him 55% to 39% over his Republican challenger, and there is noreasonto believe that will change or that his replacement will be any better.
[Via Jess]
Yet again MORE financial conflicts of interest with IL Supreme Court Justice Rochford [More]
Not that the new and improved DOJ cares…
Abusive Discretion picked it up, but none of the “gun groups” are incentivized to mention it.
[Via Non_Fudd’s Ghost]
Yet ANOTHER example of bias/Conflict of Interest with anti-gun IL Supreme Court Justice [More]
More on Elizabeth Rochford…
And ARFCOM News noticed DOJ indifference, @ 5 minutes in…
[Via Non_Fudd’s Ghost]

Yet despite clear evidence of bias, thanks to a U.S. Department of Justice official policy of deliberate indifference, such judges will remain on the bench. [More]
What’s that John F. Kennedy quote about making peaceful revolution impossible…?

Illinois Dem lawmaker pushes bill to legalize attacks on police for people having mental health episode [More]
That seems a bit bipolar, since she also supports edicts making police the “Only Ones” with guns. And it’s an interesting admission about the constituents she represents.

“This is an important ruling in a case that has been up and down the Illinois judicial ladder a couple of times already,” noted SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “We expect the state to appeal again, which could put the case right back before the Illinois Supreme Court for the third time, and we are confident we will win. It’s hard to see how the Illinois Supreme Court avoids the constitutional issue, as they have done on the previous two visits.” [More]
They’ll pull something out of their … robes.