Category: Election Integrity

It’s My Party and I’ll Leave If I Want To

It was a party that fought for civil liberties and rights, remembering how neighbors and friends were thrown in Japanese internment camps during World War II, their freedoms taken away in an instant. It was a party inspired by JFK and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., who showed us what is possible when we as Americans come together. [More]

It was the party that threw those citizens into the camps and led the filibuster against the Civil Rights Act.

I welcome the noises she’s making but I still don’t trust her.

That’s Debatable

Contorting, lol. And I never said, or even suggested, any of that. The 3% just objectively proves you were wrong about A+ meaning you always have to be right–it doesn’t imply anything about subjective weights of infringements. [More]

I’m moving the “debate” here because it’s bad form to hijack another man’s post with an argument, because it doesn’t limit me to 280 characters, and because I basically use “advocacy media” to promote my work, so as long as I’m doing it, why limit eyeballs?

The thread with the back-and-forths starts here. My response to this latest:

Not “wrong,” just not expecting you to argue a formal academic scale instead of one of principle. My assumption was you were saying helping Gonzales return to power only counted 3% against a grade of 100. I just didn’t realize what you were talking about because it struck me as so off-topic.

My mistake was accepting your distracting from the real issue with non sequiturs about 3% and age and four terms. It’s simple: Abbot is enabling a Quisling who sold us out to Biden’s tyranny and will predictably do so again. And you’re excusing him and doing so helps the establishment GOP exclude new and principled contenders, with no disincentives. So from my point of view, the one who “always has to be right” is the one evading that reality to instead try and score an irrelevant “gotcha.”

To me, real 2A fidelity means 100%, kind of like the reverse of you can’t be a little bit pregnant. Maybe it means something different to you.

And the “Bipartisan bill” did more than create new opportunities for ATF to destroy lives and kill your fellow gun owners on private sales. They’re extending the net for all it’s worth.

UPDATE

LOL, no. You are welcome to write what you want wherever you want, but I’m under no obligation to obey your unilateral dictates. Have fun with that, though.

With ‘Republicans’ Like These, Who Needs Clowns?

When we checked, the only candidate whose website listed this group as “endorsing” them was Goodwin. Two candidates we contacted had never heard of them and had not requested, and were unaware of, the endorsements. Hilariously, the website twice misquoted the Second Amendment as “the right to bear and keep arms.” [More]

But Democrats are the only ones laughing.

The Anti-Kraken

But The New York Times reported in early April that covert Chinese accounts are masquerading as supporters of former President Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee. These accounts are also promoting conspiracy theories, stoking domestic divisions and attacking Biden ahead of the election in November. [More]

Just to be clear, when election fraud allegations point at Democrats, they’re “baseless.”

And since “Russian collusion” didn’t work, we’ll just change the meme to “Chinese.”

I Got Them Uniparty Blues

Bannon: House Republicans secretly want Trump to lose [More]

Remember what Prof. Quigley said:

“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy”

And guess who took that to heart.

None Dare Call It Treason

And more…

And anyone who doesn’t accept endorse the results will be a baseless conspiracist-cum-insurrectionist.

[Via bondmen]

Stealing It Right in Front of Us

Judge Allows Juror Who ‘Celebrated Trump’s Loss in 2020’ to Stay in Pool [More]

Does anyone really believe this is anything but a partisan plot to let Democrats steal the election because they’re pretty sure that “greatest threat” is too disorganized and perceives it has too much to lose by going kinetic?

[Via bondmen]

A Plan Comes Together

Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue.” And I have that on good authority.

And still, no “single issue” deflector or open borders “libertarian” will take my challenge.

That’s Why They Call It the Stupid Party

The dolts are bound and determined to lose to the pants pooper.

How many also voted for the Biden Gungrab?

So it’s safe to assume everyone trolling Biggs on this is for warrantless searches. As long as it applies to their enemies.

Of bigger concern: Is Trump trying to blow it?