When the Wrong People are Afraid

‘I Hope You Die’: Antifa Tries to Intimidate Old Woman Leaving TPUSA Rally and Democrats Are Silent [More]

I note in the other video where they’re following a couple, the masked “female” (who knows?) tries to tell the cops the people they’re harassing have been drinking when they approach their car– in other words, self-proclaimed “anarchists” are self-appointed snitches for the state.

Don’t worry about the hypocrisy– they thrive on gaslighting, and on perceived invulnerability from the pushback they’re f-ing around to find out.

You can’t give them the beatings they deserve — you can’t even repel them, because remember, the cowardly sadists only show up in “safe” zones where the “law” protects their lawlessness.

My question for those inclined to ignore “avoid crowds” advice and counterprotest at such events: They’re following people they hate. Why not surreptitiously follow them, including after they decide to leave and get in their cars?

Col. Cooper’s “masked men as ‘ninja’” observation goes double for smelly terrorist thugs.

[Via bondmen]

A ‘Liberal’ Approach to Guns

In contrast to the dominant scholarly approaches, which focus on gun deviance and harm, I find there is more to firearms than criminal violence, injury and death; more to gun owners than straight white men; and more to gun culture than democracy-destroying right-wing politics. [More]

If not for “straight white men” and “right-wing politics,” you wouldn’t have any guns, you fool.

I’ve written about his DEI “gun culture” before, and rather than unifying us, as he either delusionally believes or pretends to believe for an agenda, it’s a divide-and-conquer tactic, aided and abetted by Democrat-enabling trainers: Remember, with “progressives,” every day is Opposite Day.

[Via Andy M]

We’re the Only Ones Influential Enough

Brooklyn Heights Police chief arrested for OVI after hitting car [More]

I notice they didn’t say anything about Ohio Revised Code Section 2923.15:

No person, while under the influence of alcohol or any drug of abuse, shall carry … any firearm or dangerous ordnance.

Are we to assume he was unarmed or was this “professional courtesy”? Or just a realization that they all do it?

Not that I’d expect a “real reporter” to know to ask…

Enquiring minds want to know.

[Via Sweet Babboo]

Lies, Damned Lies…

Nearly Two-Thirds of U.S. Adults Have Experienced In-Person Gun Violence [More]

With 38.5% of black adults (within a 14% total population) experiencing a higher rate and reporting it. Wait– how do they get to “two-thirds”…?

NAGR walks us through the lies.

That this is being published through Physicians Weekly as fact instead of laughable propaganda shows what agenda-driven liars the Gunquack Establishment promotes to 100% of its adherents.

But then, we knew that.

Now take your clot shot.

[Via WiscoDave]

Yay Jeanine! She’s our Gal! We Don’t Have a Better Pal!

President Donald Trump wants Fox News host Jeanine Pirro to be the top federal prosecutor in Washington, D.C. Interim U.S. attorney Ed Martin had been nominated, but his named was pulled after a single senator announced his opposition. [More]

That would be the Weasel Whisperer.

As for Jeanine:

She joined the New Yorkers Against Gun Violence anti-defense zealots in a Columbine High School Memorial Blood Dance to call “for renewal and strengthening of the federal assault weapons ban.”

She launched a “gun amnesty/buyback” program—“no questions asked,” naturally, “to get illegal and unwanted weapons off the streets.”

I guess gun rights aren’t important when your Republican fundraiser husband [was] a federal prison alumnus—as a felon, he can’t legally own a gun. Besides, when you have a taxpayer-funded bodyguard, one who made more than $87,000 in overtime in addition to his $101,000-plus salary, who need a personal gun?

You ever get the feeling peceived loyalty “trumps” principles…?

I understand she makes pro-gun noises now, but has she ever apologized, admitted what she did was wrong, and explained why it was wrong so we could be sure she knows?

Who Could Have Seen THAT Coming?

Accordingly, we hold that LCMs do not fit the constitutional definition of “arms” before even reaching whether they are “commonly used for self-defense.”However, LCMs also fall outside either protection of the right to bear arms because the provisions protect only those arms that are commonly used for selfdefense, and we have been presented with no credible and persuasive evidence or argument that LCMs are commonly used for such a purpose. [More]

Gee, who would ever think those arguments could be a trap?

Daily Defense Redux

In this conversation, Mark Walters and David Codrea delve into the complexities surrounding the Second Amendment and gun control. They discuss the implications of the ‘common use’ argument, the distinction between self-defense and militia purposes, and the political landscape regarding gun rights. Personal anecdotes highlight how perspectives on gun ownership can change over time, emphasizing the importance of understanding the historical context of the Second Amendment. [More]

The discussion revolved around my latest from Firearms News.

What’s the Word for Rule By Murderers, Thieves, and Whores?

According to Bessent, over one-third of the 1.5 billion payments issued by the Treasury Department in the past year cannot be traced back to a corresponding appropriation. That’s 500 million payments (not dollars — individual disbursements) that cannot readily be matched for auditing or accountability purposes. [More]

I don’t know about you, but I could use a little Lee Greenwood right about now…

[Via bondmen]

Paging Bondi’s 2A Task Force…

Feds insist Second Amendment doesn’t protect machine guns [More]

Again?

And try figuring this argument out:

Machine guns are atypical weapons not protected by the Second Amendment because a reasonable person would not expect them to be used in militia service, the federal government argued Wednesday before an appeals panel.

Right. The Founders obviously intended the citizenry to resist tyranny with inferior arms.

I assume these government lawyer aren’t retarded, so that makes them goddamn liars.

If machine guns aren’t protected, the Second Amendment is a dead letter and anyone who maintains otherwise is a fraud.

[Via Andy M]

SWAT’s Happening

The left’s acceptance and even advocacy of violence against the famous has led to the targeting of conservative media figures and conservative social media influencers for “swatting”… [More]

All you have to do is see what ugly, evil, and cowardly people hate us to know we’re on the side of what is right and good.

The perpetrators of terrorist acts need to be treated as terrorists.

And there needs to be a legal standard to inform police decisions on what constitutes exigent circumstances, with anonymous calls requiring a special decision/authorization process invoking interim steps, like maybe calling the damn house…

[Via Michael G]

Muster Call?

Stalled 2A Bills Need Your Support [More]

Say everybody floods the switchboards and the bills make it out of committee. Then what?

I see the 2A blogosphere and guntubers mobilizing on this while actual doable priorities remain ignored and mostly unknown. I’d say at least it will help flush out committee RINOs, but then have to ask what gun owners will do about it, because they all seem to flourish with impunity.

Related UPDATE

But far be it for the “no compromise gun lobby” to notice this.

Nothin’ at this writing…

I miss Larry’s leadership.

Verified by MonsterInsights