Notes from the Resistance
Harris Silent on Past Promise to Give ‘Dreamers’ Pathway to Citizenship – The campaign also didn’t say if Harris would support “using ‘parole in place” for any other group of undocumented immigrants.”[More]
Of course it’s what she intends. She just doesn’t weant to tell the electorate until after she’s in office.
“I’m gonna cut it off….There’s no reason for us to discuss this any further.”
“If this becomes unproductive, I can clear this room.” [More]
What did Mr. Kennedy have to say about that?
And there’s always rotten fruits and vegetables at the local parade…
[Via Michael G]
Received via email:
Mass Immigration Reduction Act of 2024
- Rep. Rosendale Introduces Legislation to Secure the Border | U.S. Representative Matt Rosendale
- Text – H.R.6940 – 118th Congress (2023-2024): Mass Immigration Reduction Act of 2024 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
- Should U.S. Adopt an Immigration Moratorium? | Newsmax.com
- Rep Rosendale introduces immigration package to restore Trump-era policies, ‘shut down the border’ | Fox News
- Legislation | Immigration Accountability Project
Prognosis 1% chance of being enacted
What further proof is needed that we are being ruled by traitors?
New Anti-Gun Group Focused on State Legislatures [More]
To quote a line from The Patriot:
Would you tell me please, Mr. Howard, why should I trade one tyrant three thousand miles away for three thousand tyrants one mile away? An elected legislature can trample a man’s rights as easily as a king can.
China’s New Export Restriction Choke Hold on Critical U.S. Ammunition Components, Are You Prepared? [More]
No, if course I’m not prepared. No one is prepared for the larger issue of critical material supplies that can be cut off at any time in the hands of those who want to eat us.
And that’s just the way the men behind the curtain want things.
…26 million Americans believe “the use of force” is justified to keep Trump from regaining the presidency. [More]
They mean “by others,” and like the MSNBC moron, most have no clue that it could blow back on them up close and personal. They think they’ll read about it, make some “serve’s the fasicsts right” comments on social media, and that’ll be the end of it.
[Via bondmen]
Hillary Clinton Says Americans Should Be Criminally Charged and Jailed for Spreading “Misinformation” [More]
And Trump and those who support his agenda are “a danger to our country and world.”
It depends upon what the meaning of the word “misinformation” is.
Who thinks we can get along with this?
[Via bondmen]
Revealing, and emotionally satisfying, the way he dismissed these two oath-breaking machine cogs, but I’m not inclined to emulate it.
Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue.” And I have that on good authority.
[Via Andy M]
Houston Officials Trusted a Dishonest Drug Cop for Decades Before His Lies Killed 2 People … “There was no confidential informant,” Goines wrote. “I made the purchase by myself.” [More]
Another reason why “anonymous” snitch lines are evil:
What if you’re a cop and getting a warrant might prove problematic? (It’s not like we haven’t seen prominent warrant “workarounds” at the highest law enforcement levels recently.) Calling in a tip could reduce a lot of red tape.
Some people make me rethink my opposition to crucifixion, and I’m not even thinking as a deterrent.
[Via Michael G]
The real fascists, they said, were the treacherous liberals in the Roosevelt and Truman administrations who had handed over Eastern Europe to Soviet dictator Josef Stalin at Yalta in 1945 and were now intent on turning America into a socialist superstate. [More]
Treacherous liberals are still the real fascists, who are socialists, as explained in a book I hope at least some of you have ordered.
The more Jacob Heilbrunn and Politico try to make a case for condemning Carlson, Buchanan, and others, the more they make a case against it.
Merrick Garland: ‘Dangerous’ and ‘Outrageous’ to Criticize the DOJ [More]
And if you do, you’re a “greatest threat” white supremacist.
[Via Michael G]
Of course they’re talking about taking your guns.
The psy ops is in full force, with “conservative” Frank Luntz telling lefty media that Trump’s toast. Admittedly, the guy let himself get rattled and, as in 2020, the election is his to blow, but the real focus on behavior ought to be on someone who can lie so seamlessly and with a smile, using a mask of compassion and concern to hide malevolent intent.
There’s something deeply wrong with a person who can do that.
[Via Jess]
For places that are newer, Defendants must point to regulations that are analogous to the regulations cited by the Supreme Court, taking into account that it is illogical to expect a government to regulate a place before it existed in its modern form. [More]
So, any building, parcel, street, city, territory, or state developed after ratification…?
What other articles in the Bill of Rights does this apply to?
Freedom is interconnected. If a government is not afraid to take your guns, why would it hesitate to suppress your speech? [More]
Who do these people think they are? Democrats?
The future of the Supreme Court is on the line in November’s elections. If Vice President Kamala Harris and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer are victorious in November, the independent Supreme Court that the Framers bequeathed to us will be a thing of the past. That’s one of the big reasons why Harris must be defeated in her campaign for president, and why Schumer must be demoted to Minority Leader. [More]
I forgot to mention: The Guardians beat Pittsburgh!
[Via bondmen]