3D printed guns – The War on Guns

Like a Rolling Stone

Rolling Stone promotes gun radical who advocates for far-left terrorism, celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death [More]

Well, naturally.

Nobody really thought they were “anti-gun” for everybody, did they?

The NeverEnding Story

At least 16 states have now put 3D gun laws on the books, with seven states adding major legislation this year. [More]

And, of course, it’s not just 3D guns they want to ban.

So… how many lawsuits must rights advocates pay for, in how many districts and circuits, with no clear resolve on the part of the Supreme Court to order “shall not be infringed,” on Congress to pass sanctions, and on DOJ to enforce rights? Bits and pieces are offered and bits and pieces are taken back. But it will never happen unless and until there is a clear “or else” promise behind our demands.

Anybody seeing a groundswell that can’t be ignored for that?

Never Saw a Freedom They Didn’t Want to Eviscerate

Colorado Bill Criminalizing Computer Code Sparks Constitutional Battle Over Gun Rights and Free Speech [More]

Well, they are Democrats...

If Wishes Were Fishes

“Think of a world where you can’t buy a printer that prints a 3D gun,” Bragg said during a CityLaw Breakfast event at New York Law School. “We don’t then have to do the enforcement cases.” [More]

What he’s really saying is think of a world without guns.

Except for his enforcers, of course…

[Via bondmen]

A Fine Madness

The mere idea that someone can print a gun has turned every leftist technocrat policymaker into a raving f_g lunatic. [More]

Sounds like OCPD to me…

[Via Michael G]

You Can’t Stop the Signal?

CTRL+PEW Sues California in Federal Court Over 3D-Printed Gun Files [More]

Who else aims to misbehave?

[Via WiscoDave]

Too Little Too Late

🥛 https://t.co/qPdCaqgVel
— The 3D Print General (@3DPrintGeneral) November 15, 2025

Kinda looks like the damage is done.

Their biggest problem is they didn’t sound like they were under duress– they sounded like they were gung-ho on it.

[Via CP]

AMAZING 3D REALISM!

DDS sends “I tried 3D printing a gun: It’s not as easy as you think,” from 2023 (and FWIW written by someone who begins with a lament about “gun violence”), and Wikipedia entries for the Urutau 3D-printable semi-automatic bullpup pistol-caliber carbine, and my favorite just for its name, the FGC-9.

I don’t normally do hardware posts but this is, at its core, about freedom.

It Depends Upon What the Meaning of the Word ‘Protection’ Is

Inside The 3D Printed Gun Movement—And The Government’s Attempts To Spy On It [More]

“Full might,” eh?

[Via WiscoDave]

HOW THINGS WORK AROUND HERE

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Anyone not happy with anything on this site at any time will get 100% of all money they paid to me refunded, no questions asked. (No gratuities solicited or accepted.)

Comment House Rules

Keep them on topic. Trying to hijack threads really grinds my gears. No spam.
I moderate them so I’ll get to them when I can.
No threats against anyone except me. No fights–this is my place and if things get ugly, I treat unruly visitors the same way as I would in my home. Do not feed trolls–I’ll take out the trash.
Try to keep it clean.
I’m the final arbiter. If you don’t like the rules, start your own damn blog.

WarOnGuns Correspondents

Story tips received via email and social media messages will be credited. Just let me know how you want to be recognized (real name, first name/last initial, or screen name.)

Link Policy

I maintained a WogRoll at the old Blogspot place predicated on reciprocity with like-minded RKBA-related sites. Truth be told, I never got much in terms of site visits to make the effort worth the time. I may try to do something again in the future, but for now, my hands are more than full trying to get a new site started.

Advertising Disclosure

This is a placeholder for now because I have not done ads on the old blog for years. In case I ever start them up here, this will be the policy in effect: The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don’t think we’re getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you’re stupid, too. I have had a few ads on the old site in the past and may do so again if I think it’s worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn’t buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don’t mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now–you’re not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer without complete disclosure.

About “The Only Ones”

So named from a comment by DEA agent Lee Paige, who told a classroom full of kids he was “the only one” qualified to be armed and then promptly shot himself in the foot, the purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it’s also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank, or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they’re involved in gun-related incidents.