Tag: Michigan

The Volunteer Patsy

So he’s not MAGA, since Nick Fuentes calls “Trumpism a cult.”

And as a self-evident truth, judging someone by non-volitional circumstances instead of as an individual is a form of collectivism. Hatemonger Nick and his retard Groypers are on the commie side of the scale. I wonder how many of them are fed plants/provocateurs/CIs.

Maybe we’ll find out once DOJ files are opened to the new AG’s scrutiny.

What no one seems to be acknowledging: Somebody invited this @$$hole to speak in front of the committee since they knew they could use him to smear and conflate.

How was he selected and who arranged it?

This was a setup, and this moron is a useful idiot tool. Good luck to the young fool ever getting a job.

What You Need to Be is Controlled

Michigan Senate Democrats are trying to ban making a ‘false statement or misrepresentation’ about elections. [More]

They hate the First Amendment as much as they do the Second, with every one of the sponsors also signing on to this.

Who are the idiot “third way” Republicans acting like what’s needed here is clarification instead of repudiation?

[Via Michael G]

Speaking of Galatians 6:7…

If the Church weren’t compromised by spiritual wickedness in high places, every parish in America would play this video right before the Eucharist. Just preface it by identifying who this is and saying they are not making political but First Amendment-protected theological commentary on Biblical teachings about sin, and they wouldn’t need to say another word that could compromise their nonprofit status.

Except for these guys…

Let’s see if Kamala approves of Blasphemers for Harris.

Related UPDATE

Just three weeks out from the 2024 general election, 41 million Christians say they aren’t voting. They say they don’t like their options, which might be the most intellectually lazy thing someone can assert in our self-governing republic. [More]

Self-righteous inaction does not absolve from culpablity.

Not a Democrat This Time

State Rep. Neil Friske arrested in Lansing after police respond to reports of man with gun … “We do not have any details, besides what the media sourced, oddly before anyone of us knew anything.” [More]

This looks like how:

Records the Free Press obtained Friday through the online Michigan State Police criminal background service, the Internet Criminal History Access Tool, show police requested felony charges of sexual assault, assault, and a weapons-related offense…

I’m gonna have to check that out.

Bear in mind he has not been arraigned at this writing and what charges will actually be brought against him are as yet unknown. Still, it’s a reminder of an obligation each of us who publicly advocate for the right to arms have to keep our noses clean.

[Via Antigone]

Michigan Sheriff Reneges on Pledge to Not Enforce Red Flag Edict

To publicly excuse himself from going along with what he knows to be wrong, the sheriff offered an unconvincing anecdote “involving a man having a mental health crisis” [More]

Someone needs to tell this “Only One” that “just following orders” is not as good look…

We’re the Only Ones Processing Enough

Sometimes shining bright lights and banging pots and pans work.

Intolerable, that it took communicated outrage. And that the “concession” still isn’t good enough. And that “permits” are a thing.

[Via Jess]

We’re the Only Ones Lucky Enough

F/Lt Mike Shaw stated “Here is another example of a CPL holder not being able to handle their emotions because traffic was slowed due to a crash. This suspect lost their cool, grabbed an accessible hand gun and put others at risk. We are lucky he didn’t pull the trigger.” [More]

“Another”! It’s Dodge City out there! Despite the suspect not having been tried yet while the MSP spokesflack essentially pronounces him guilty.

Because only the “Only Ones” can be trusted with guns, right, Lt. Mike?

[Via Jess]

Felon Proves ‘Safe Storage’ Laws Don’t Protect Lives

A Michigan man was charged Tuesday under the state’s new law requiring safe storage of guns after his 2-year-old daughter shot herself in the head with his revolver the day after the law took effect. [More]

I’d think a responsible j0urnalist would put the part about him being a prohibted person felon right up in the headline. Of COURSE he doesn’t obey any “gun laws.”

Care to tell us more about him– and why he was out?

And why the photo of the everyman-looking professor instead of the idiot “dad”?

Safe storage practices are done by the responsible. Safe storage laws don’t change that.

[Via bondmen]

Michigan’s New Gun Laws for 2024 Won’t Stop Violence but Will Infringe on Rights

They’ll be back for more, and more, and more. Because they’ll take what they can get incrementally, but never lose sight of the goal that they want it all. [More]

Who thinks they’ll stop with this?

Friend of the Devil

Michigan Democrat Staffer Poses With Picture of ‘Sexy’ Satanic Statue [More]

Friends with benefits…?

You could ask “What’s wrong with these people?” but the best answer you’re likely to get is is “They’re Democrats.”

Besides, what do you expect from Gretchen Whitmer supporters?

[Via Michael G]

Adventures in Baselessness

It took over one year of wrangling and a lawsuit, but the Michigan Grassroots Alliance (MGA), an election integrity watchdog group, has gotten what it sought—a segment of video surveillance tape that may serve as evidence in an investigation of the handling of voting results on election night in 2022 by some county election officials. [More]

So who are the election-interfering seditious conspirators again …?

[Via Michael G]

Forbidden Thoughts

33% of Generation Z believes using the wrong gender pronoun should be illegal. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer supports similar legislation that comes with potential jail sentences. [More]

What kind of anti-government extremist would support seditious conspiracies to defy that?

Or to oppose these pieces of totalitarian sh!+…?

[Via Michael G]

Guilty Until Proven Innocent

The judge would have 24 hours to decide on a protection order after a request is filed. If granted, the judge would then have 14 days to set a hearing during which the flagged person would have to prove they do not pose a significant risk. [More]

Time was even a child immediately grasped the tyrannical absurdity of:

“Sentence first — verdict afterwards.”

Let’s see how many “small dick” rebuttals this gets.

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights