Despised by the Despicable

Why should someone who desn’t respect yolur right to arms respect your right to petition for redress? Chad Clifford can afford to smirk because he knows he’s in a safe Democrat district.

Bonus points if anyone knows who my title came from.

[Via Jess]

UPDATE

Points to DDS for Kurt Hofmann. Some of you guessed Vanderboegh, and that’s who he heard it from.

No Fool Like an Old Fool

Federal judge upholds Colorado’s waiting period for firearm purchases [More]

So this Carter holdover dismissed Clayton Cramer’s fact-based analysis as “ad hominem” and went with the career prohibitionist, and said we need rights delayed because there might be drunks and it took time to manufacture guns back then…? What about if the gun was ready for sale?

Here’s the opinion.

What a subversive old fool.

[Via Jess]

The Same Except They’re Different

The argument that commercially available, AR-type firearms are somehow less dangerous or lethal simply because they fire only in semi-automatic mode is misleading. They retain the identical performance capabilities and characteristics (save full-automatic capability) as initially intended for use in combat. [More]

Oh, is that all? Spread that lie under oath!

Also from the linked Exhibit:

As mentioned previously in this report, many of the firearms prohibited by the Ordinances directly trace their origins to those developed for use in combat. As such, these firearms were never initially intended for general distribution or sale to the public.

Except if we’re talking ARs, and of course he is, guess which one came first:

“Colt sent a pilot model rifle (serial no. GX4968) to the BATF for civilian sale approval on Oct. 23, 1963. It was approved on Dec. 10, 1963, and sales of the ‘Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle’ began on Jan 2, 1964,” one critic of the article contended. “The M16 wasn’t issued to infantry units until 1965 (as the XM16E1), wasn’t standardized as the M16A1 until 1967, and didn’t officially replace the M14 until 1969.”

Tell me this Yurgealitis trough feeder isn’t cognizant of Founding intent and is incentivized by those who fear that and obscure it through gaslighting.

And tangentially related:

As predicted, they’re taking full advantage of Scalia’s critical error.

In re later “Bowie knives” edicts and the like, does anyone have a record of such laws ever being challenged on Second Amendment grounds and such bans being upheld and/or appealed to a higher court?

An Age-Old Question

Colorado’s age limit for buying rifles will not increase to 21 anytime soon. A new law to raise the age limit was blocked — again — by federal judges on Tuesday. The decision from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals means that the 21-plus gun law will remain on hold as the larger court battle continues, perhaps for a year or longer. [More]

Get ’em while you can, young men.

And never give them up.

Funny, what the leftists call “kids.”

Until it’s time to vote or for puberty blockers.

[Via Jess]

The First of Many

The Rocky Mountain Gun Owners group is suing over two new laws – one that requires a minimum three-day waiting period before a firearm can be purchased and raising the minimum age to purchase a firearm to 21 years old. [More]

Everybody kinda figured

If I learn about any more today I’ll update this post.

[Via cydl]

Verified by MonsterInsights