Notes from the Resistance
The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners have filed a reply brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of Novotny v. Moore, SAF’s challenge to Maryland’s so-called “sensitive places” carry ban. [More]
What do you think the chances are the men who consented to be governed would have been OK with “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed– except over here, and here, and…”?
SAF SEEKS SUPREME COURT REVIEW IN ‘SENSITIVE PLACES’ CASE [More]
It’s not that “shall not be infringed” is hard to understand.
It’s that criminally ignoring it is so easy.
[A]s Bruen explained, larger, open places like cities, sidewalks, and parks cannot be considered sensitive places because it would effectively nullify the Second Amendment right to categorically exclude them from its coverage. [More]
Thanks for throwing your fellow gun-grabbers under the public transit bus!
Now acknowledge that even with closed space “protection,” “it’s”Only Ones” who claimed credit for stopping attacks have been reported to be hiding while a citizen subdued the attacker, and then there’s the not insignificant matter of making it to or from the “sensitive area” in one piece.
[Via Jess]
A major new study supporting the 2nd Amendment has been released on the eve of Oral Argument in the Seigel/Koons case out of NJ. [Watch]
Now we get to see how that 8 to 6 Republican ratio matters.
There’s still one real vulnerability I don’t see addressed by on-premises armed guards and metal detectors:
You gotta make it from the parking lot to the building first.
[Via Jess]