Sources Say Lobbyist Chris Cox & Rep Kustoff Pushing to Keep Suppressors on the NFA [More]
He’s probably just playing 3D chess.
[Via Jess]
UPDATE
AmmoLand reposted its article with Cox’s unequivocal denial/disavowal. I wonder who Crump’s source was.
Notes from the Resistance
Sources Say Lobbyist Chris Cox & Rep Kustoff Pushing to Keep Suppressors on the NFA [More]
He’s probably just playing 3D chess.
[Via Jess]
UPDATE
AmmoLand reposted its article with Cox’s unequivocal denial/disavowal. I wonder who Crump’s source was.
Stalled 2A Bills Need Your Support [More]
Say everybody floods the switchboards and the bills make it out of committee. Then what?
I see the 2A blogosphere and guntubers mobilizing on this while actual doable priorities remain ignored and mostly unknown. I’d say at least it will help flush out committee RINOs, but then have to ask what gun owners will do about it, because they all seem to flourish with impunity.
Related UPDATE
But far be it for the “no compromise gun lobby” to notice this.
I miss Larry’s leadership.
Why do ATF agents need new suppressors for their ARs? [More]
Oh, look! LEs use the same “hearing protection” argument “our side” does (instead of us claiming it as a right government has no legitimate claim to). Meanwhile, the grabtard lobby tells its useful idiots that, in the hands of mere citizens, they are “inherently dangerous devices” and “deadly accessories.”
So California requires one and bans the other… Is this where some idiot “progressive” would say “Yeah, but cars don’t kill people”?
[Via Jess]
Acting U.S. Attorney Michael Simpson files brief for @TheJusticeDept arguing that silencers are NOT arms & are NOT protected by the Second Amendment. [More]
Did I hear someone say gun owners are losing patience?

Yeah, but he’s only been on the job two months and he’s got a lot on his plate and he’s playing a 3D chess game and… aside from “Would you rather have Kamala?” what excuse did I miss?
And any word on the Bondi report yet?
[Via Andy M]

Facebook and Instagram Ads Push Gun Silencers Disguised as Car Parts – A network of Facebook pages has been advertising “fuel filters” that are actually meant to be used as silencers, which are heavily regulated by US law. Even US military officials are concerned. [More]
Mehrotra, eh…?
I keep going back to the last paragraph.
And Wired being ultimately controlled by the same billionaire who profits from Teen Vogue’s anal sex tips for teens…
Why do I have the feeling that if fuel filters were being used for something else it wouldn’t be a story?
[Via Michael G]
Last month, Representatives August Pfluger (R-TX) and Jared Golden (D-ME) introduced the bipartisan “Protecting Americans’ Right to Silence Act of 2024” (PARTS Act), H.R. 10145, which seeks to modernize and clarify the federal definition of firearm suppressors under the Gun Control Act. [More]
So Republicans help Gungrabber Golden burnish his reputation with a bill that has a 1% chance of being enacted, meaning it costs Democrats nothing but buys them all kinds of Fuddwill and “gunfluencer” kudos…
[Via Jess]

President Trump has a tool to push for the passage of legislation, such as the hearing protection act. The executive branch, specifically the Secretary of the Treasury, can unilaterally declare an amnesty for people to register NFA items with the ATF. [More]
Wouldn’t that imply they’d done something wrong and that citizens should obey tyrannical claims on their rights…?
Yeah, of course I know the alternative.
Some of us have considered that before charting our own course.
I like Dean, he does a lot of valuable stuff and I’m sure he’s doing his best to let us know about something that could keep us out of trouble. I guess I’m just surprised to see this on JPFO.

Accordingly, “Miller stood for the proposition ‘that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapons not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as 3 short-barreled shotguns’ [More]
That’s not what Miller said at all.
He’s not through with the clown act:
While a silencer may be a firearm accessory, it is not a “bearable arm” that is capable of casting a bullet.
Neither was my “machinegun,” or “high capacity” magazines, or braces, or 80% receivers, or…
And again, “common use” is proving to be a trap.
It’s way past time to pasture this senile old “Reagan Republican.“
[Via Jess]
Investigators believe, judging from surveillance video and evidence collected from the scene, that the shooter had at least some prior firearms training and experience with guns and the weapon was equipped with a silencer, the official said. [More]
So much for that reform not being hysterically attacked, even though it had no bearing on the outcome. Now all they need is to tie him in with right to life.
At least he appeared to respect the law enough to stay just on the outskirts of Manhattan’s “sensitive area”:

The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery endorses the use of firearm suppressors as an effective method of reducing the risk of hearing loss, especially when used in conjunction with conventional hearing protective measure. [More]
Finally– a qualified diagnosis.
Funny… all the other side has in terms of “experts” are prohibitonist apparatchiks with unqualified opinions…
[Via Jess]
With Republicans holding the House, Senate, and White House, now is the time to pass a Hearing Protection Act to protect the environment. [More]
Yeah? Think you can find enough Democrat Fudds to override Brian Fitzpatrick and fellow Vichycons…?
[Via bondmen]
Firearm Suppressor Demand Explodes At Historic Rate [More]
If they’re such a “significant danger,” where’s the proof?
Oh, there isn’t any to justify bans?
And does “silencer-related crimes” mean they were used or just present?
[Via bondmen]