Tom Gresham - The War on Guns

Gun Talk

Why do some gun stores and trainers support restrictions on gun rights? David Codrea has some ideas. [Listen]

I had another interesting chat with Tom Gresham, much of it revolving around my AmmoLand piece about the gun store owner who supports the Biden administration killing private sales.

Point/Counterpoint

Wrong. These are vets who said they need or get help with their personal finances. Then they are stipped of their rights for life. Current law provides a method — those adjudicated (in court) as mentally incompetent, lose gun rights. A court. Not a bureaucrat at the V.A.
— Tom Gresham (@Guntalk) March 6, 2024

What can I say but “Chris Murphy”?

I should go back and retitle this Damned Lie/Truth.

It’s What Weasels Do

Law professor Don Kilmer details now government lawyers lie to the courts on Second Amendment issues… [Listen]

If judges are hesitant to impose sanctions, I’m wondering why more use isn’t made of ethics complaints to the bar…

Gun Talk Redux

Journalist David Codrea examines the gun laws that enabled the attack on parishioners in a Catholic church in Nigeria. The same gun laws some want passed in the U.S. [Listen]

Here’s my conversation yesterday with host Tom Gresham.

Another ‘Gun Sense Voter’

Anti-gun activist attempted to kill Justice Kavanaugh at his home…with a gun – Just remember who the crazy ones really are in the debate over guns. [More]

And Tom Gresham and The Federalist identify a prime inciter…

[Via President Non_Fudd]

UPDATE:

What is the possible reason for Ruth Sent Us to take that picture and post it as a “special message” to Kavanaugh’s wife and children? [More]

Because they’re ruthless? (Funny thing is, “thanks” to publicly accessible online filings, it only took me a few minutes to find some of the names behind this group and where they’re from. If someone not as nice as me wanted to play hardball in terms of publicizing meatspace locations, well, what is that saying regarding turnabout?)

[Via Michael G]

HOW THINGS WORK AROUND HERE

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Anyone not happy with anything on this site at any time will get 100% of all money they paid to me refunded, no questions asked. (No gratuities solicited or accepted.)

Comment House Rules

Keep them on topic. Trying to hijack threads really grinds my gears. No spam.
I moderate them so I’ll get to them when I can.
No threats against anyone except me. No fights–this is my place and if things get ugly, I treat unruly visitors the same way as I would in my home. Do not feed trolls–I’ll take out the trash.
Try to keep it clean.
I’m the final arbiter. If you don’t like the rules, start your own damn blog.

WarOnGuns Correspondents

Story tips received via email and social media messages will be credited. Just let me know how you want to be recognized (real name, first name/last initial, or screen name.)

Link Policy

I maintained a WogRoll at the old Blogspot place predicated on reciprocity with like-minded RKBA-related sites. Truth be told, I never got much in terms of site visits to make the effort worth the time. I may try to do something again in the future, but for now, my hands are more than full trying to get a new site started.

Advertising Disclosure

This is a placeholder for now because I have not done ads on the old blog for years. In case I ever start them up here, this will be the policy in effect: The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don’t think we’re getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you’re stupid, too. I have had a few ads on the old site in the past and may do so again if I think it’s worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn’t buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don’t mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now–you’re not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer without complete disclosure.

About “The Only Ones”

So named from a comment by DEA agent Lee Paige, who told a classroom full of kids he was “the only one” qualified to be armed and then promptly shot himself in the foot, the purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it’s also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank, or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they’re involved in gun-related incidents.