There Goes the Boyfriend Loophole!

The question presented in this case is not whether prohibiting the
possession of firearms by someone subject to a domestic violence restraining order is a laudable policy goal. The question is whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), a specific statute that does so, is constitutional under the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. In the light of N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022), it is not. [More]

If only there were a better way

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

One thought on “There Goes the Boyfriend Loophole!”

  1. An interesting case. This guy was involved in more actul shoot-em-ups than Dillinger, but rather than do the work correctly, the cops decided to haul him in on a chickens*t victimless possession charge. Boo hoo, cops.

Comments are closed.

Verified by MonsterInsights