I’m a proud card-carrying member of the NRA… [More]
He then proceeds to endorse the evisceration of the Second Amendment.
Association Bylaws, Article III, Sec. 11, “Involuntary Termination of Membership and Disciplinary Proceedings” states in part:
“Any individual or organization member may be suspended or expelled for good cause, including, but not limited to, any conduct which is contrary to, or in violation of the Bylaws of the Association.”
This public anti-gun advocacy is in direct conflict with Article II, Purposes and Objectives, section 1:
“To protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, especially with reference to the inalienable right of the individual American citizen guaranteed by such Constitution to acquire, possess, collect, exhibit, transport, carry, transfer ownership of, and enjoy the right to use arms, in order that the people may always be in a position to exercise their legitimate individual rights of self-preservation and defense of family, person, and property, as well as to serve effectively in the appropriate militia for the common defense of the Republic and the individual liberty of its citizens;”
Additionally, Article III, “Membership,” section 1., “Eligibility,” requires that the member “subscribes to the objectives and purposes of the Association.”
I say expel the subverting old Fudd.
“No one needs an assault weapon other than the military. It’s a weapon of war, designed for mass killing in the shortest amount of time.”
In addition to David’s seemingly permanently unanswered question about that “single issue” here’s another “they” won’t answer:
If the above characterization of “assault weapon” is true, why do we let cops carry them in their patrol cars? Since when is “mass killing in the shortest amount of time” part of the mission statement of any law enforcement organization in the USA? There may well be a good reason, but if so, I’d like to know what it is.