Who Will Judge the Judges?

The public defender’s office also filed a motion explaining that Bouzy’s mother tried to get her son mental health treatment but failed. They say the mother tried to Baker Act Bouzy days before he hit deputies, but for some reason, the court rejected his mother’s request twice. Before that, there were 15 Baker Act proceedings in his criminal record that his lawyers point to as evidence of his mental illness. [More]

But…but…but licensing. Registration…

I was going to say anyone who can’t be trusted with a car, but it looks like we also need to add “with a gavel”…

[Via Edmund M]

Spawn of Democrats

“How reckless and life changing that is to shoot into a crowd of thousands of people,” Bercaw said. [More]

How evil and retarded.

How indicative of where racist Democrat social policies, incentives, and rule lead.

Then again, I probably just can’t conect to humanity.

There’s a reason why the men behind the curtain have premeditatedly mass engineered swarms who collectively and individually can’t be trusted without a custodian.

[Via Edmund M]

A River in Egypt

JAMES WAS ARRESTED IN JANUARY 2022 FOR THREE MISDEMEANOR ASSAULT CHARGES. THE VICTIM’S BELIEVED TO BE HIS PARENTS AND A SIBLING. THE FAMILY STATED THAT JAMES DOES NOT BELONG IN JAIL. [More]

That’s one hell of a tightrope to walk, weighing familial love and guilt against denial, justifiably fearing police overreactions, and ensuring due process-respecting interventions.

There oughta be a law.

[Via Jess]

With Friends Like These…

Corporate Media Conspicuously Quiet After Memphis Man Kills Four in Multi-Location Rampage [More]

No one criticizes the DSM more than I do, but that is simply not so.

Then there’s this:

Laws, if enforced, would have prevented him from owning the firearm he used to shoot women and girls.

No, they would not have. They couldn’t have unless, like the gun-grabbers, your contention is that citizen disarmament edicts work to stop chronic criminals.

They don’t.

Only one thing could.

Credible gun influencers have a responsibility to know better than to parrot the NRA’s/NSSF’s “Enforce existing Intolerable Acts” crap.

Jam Session

How a Second Amendment case at the Supreme Court is putting gun rights groups in a jam [More]

That’s one way to spin getting your usurping @$$ handed to you…

“If someone is dangerous enough that society can’t trust them with a gun, they should be behind bars − it’s that simple,” Pratt said.

Bingo.

There Oughta Be a Law

The man was arrested for felonious assault and has been charged with kidnapping, abduction and unlawful restraint, reports state. According to the article from the Akron Beacon Journal, the man has been imprisoned three times for kidnapping within the last decade. [More]

A “spate,” huh? Well, they do say “Do what you know…”

I wonder what could have stopped this…?

Substitute “woman” for “gun.”

[Via Sweet Babboo]

Knew or Should Have Known

“We just want you guys to know my brother has schizophrenia, he’s bipolar,” said the suspect’s sister, Jessica Salazar. “He was diagnosed with schizophrenia. A lot of people that have family members out there are going to understand. He would feel persecuted, voices talking to him. He tried committing suicide once or twice.” [More]

In other words, he couldn’t be trusted without a custodian.

So much for “A” grades on “gun laws.”

[Via Steve T]

A Temporary Setback?

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit out of Missouri has denied a request to hear en banc a 2nd Amendment argument by a criminal defendant who was charged with violating 18 USC 922(g)1, i.e., the ban on felons in possession of firearms law. However, four judges issued a vigorous dissent in which they called into question the constitutionality of 922(g)1. [More]

It sounds like some may be amenable to applying The Law.

[Via Jess]

Flag Down

This new initiative is called “Capture the Flag,” and it will focus on abuses and mis-application of “Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO)” statutes which have been adopted by 21 states and the District of Columbia. [More]

Their very existence is an abuse.

And there’s only one solution that nobody appears incentivized to implement.

Missing the Obvious

The order included a finding “Rahimi had ‘committed family violence’ and such violence was ‘likely to occur again in the future.’” [More]

Define “likely.”

If he was truly proven dangerous why didn’t the order remand him into custodial care until such time as he can once more be trusted to behave his punk @$$?

[Via Michael G]

Verified by MonsterInsights