Jersey Devil

The Office of New Jersey Attorney General Davenport has sent subpoenas to New Jersey federally licensed firearms dealers (FFLs) demanding detailed records pertaining to sales of Glock firearms from January 2016 until June 15, 2026, News2A recently learned. The action, which is related to the December 2024 lawsuit brought against Glock called Davenport v. Glock (formerly Platkin v. Glock), could create a public record doxing New Jersey gun owners who have purchased Glock pistols, along with personally identifiable information… “This is a logistical nightmare. It could take some people years to comply with this,” one New Jersey FFL owner told News2A. [More]

So, have any prominent FFLs pledged to refuse to comply and not give up names?

Would you submit to this?

[Via Jess]

dcodrea

Author: admin

David Codrea is a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

6 thoughts on “Jersey Devil”

  1. I’m no lawyer, but it seems reasonable to me that if state prosecutors can’t subpoena your “privileged” IRS tax information from your accountant at H&R Block, they should also not be able to subpoena your “privileged” BATF information from your gun dealer. But common sense has no place in law.

  2. IANAL, but would this not be uncompensated labor generating such a report? I thought that involuntary servitude was outlawed.

    1. Ha!

      Per Congressional Budget Office:

      “While the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) was passed in 1995 to limit cost-shifting to state and local governments, it does not prevent the government from passing regulations that force the private sector (individuals and non-governmental entities) to bear the financial cost of compliance.”

      In other words, government is the “Only Ones.”

  3. on July 4, 2026 EVERY FFL SHOULD BURN THEIR 4473’s

    Every ffl that does not burn their 4473’s should be shunned and bankrupted.

    Let independence day 2026 be the second American tea party.

  4. I know, I know…….very idealistic. true “Americans” burning their records and the red coats being shunned and boycotted. What would (what could) happen if EVERY FFL (and the supporting manufacturers) cited to Bruen (text, history, tradition) and said, by weight of numbers that there is no historical basis for compliance (art 1 sec 8 be damned!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *