Notes from the Resistance
He is presuming to apply terror rules against U.S. citizens on U.S. soil for, in the case of gun owner advocates, exercising our First Amendment-recognized right to defend and promote our Second Amendment-recognized right. [More]
If “progressive” spooks have their way, “conservatives” being “canceled” will take on a whole new meaning.
Former CIA Intelligence officer suggests using ‘counterterrorism’ strategies against ‘right-wing’ Americans [More]
I’m probably going to write this one up because I’ve got a lot more to say about such embeds.
Raise your hands, anyone who thought special counsel John Durham’s probe into the outrageous treatment of President Trump by the Obama FBI, DOJ, CIA, and State Department was ever going to amount to anything. [More]
But PJ Media and The Washington Times took a “HUGE” credibility hit in my book.
[Via bondmen]
Brennan: ‘Clearly’ Trump had ‘nefarious intentions,’ ‘nothing short of our national security at stake’ [More]
Funny, who else the rulers put in charge of intelligence.”
Everybody remember Pogo?
The Supreme Court ruled in March that Americans have no right to learn the grisly details of CIA torture because the CIA has never formally confessed its crimes. The case symbolizes how the rule of law has become little more than legal mumbo-jumbo to shroud official crimes. And it is another grim reminder that Americans cannot rely on politically approved lawyers wearing bat suits to save their freedoms. [More]
Using that standard, the government could get away with just about anything.
And generally does.
“Commonsense gun safety laws,” anyone?
[Via bondmen]
