How About One Book a Month?

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco has scheduled oral arguments Aug. 14 in the Second Amendment Foundation’s challenge of California’s one-gun-per-month (OGM) purchase restriction, in a case known as Nguyen v. Bonta. [More]

Of course it’s an infringement.

Of course the Ninth Circuit knows it.

And of course they’re going to do everything in their power to stall things until Democrats get the national majority they need to remake SCOTUS and reverse Bruen.

With your money.

According to His Nature

I could go on extensively about how Weissman admits that Biden has the power to instruct the DOJ to do whatever he wants — which directly contradicts White House talking points about the independence of the Department of Justice — but the key point I want to make here is that Weissman is lying about Biden’s commitment to the rule of law. [More]

And…?

[Via Michael G]

If By ‘Honors’ She Means Takes a Steaming Dump On…

Fortunately (and predictably, at least for the present):

Prognosis 1% chance of being enacted

It’s another try at this piece of treasonous Democrat subversion:

This Act may be cited as the Gas-Operated Semi-Automatic Firearms Exclusion Act or the GOSAFE Act.

In other words, Democrat gasbags are doing what they always do on guns: Gaslighting.

As an aside, McBath was a panelist for the Astroturf 97percent phonies who pretend to represent “reasonable” gun owners, and she let slip she was appealing to Fudds because “Bringing them into these discussions really helps us understand better ways to infiltrate…”

[Via Jess]

It Ain’t the Meat It’s the Motion

The long-held myth that men who own guns are … err, overcompensating for something … has been debunked by scientists in a new study published in the American Journal of Men’s Health. Rather, researchers at the University of Texas at San Antonio found that men quite satisfied with certain physical assets are most likely to have guns. [More]

Well, look at the type of “males” who consider themselves wits for questioning .

Hit it, Maria:

[Via WiscoDave]

The Age of Reason

New York Set to Restrict Social-Media Algorithms for Teens [More]

That’s not the parents’ job…?

It’s instructive to see what else doesn’t require parental cognizance:

Parents—once viewed as the natural authority figures in their children’s lives—now find themselves largely spectators: locked out, lied to, and gaslit in a national effort to secretly gender-transition children in public schools behind their parents’ backs.

When Democrats say “For the children,” watch out …

Verified by MonsterInsights