Notes from the Resistance
Throughout the document, Smith argues that the actions Trump took to overturn the election were in his private capacity – as a candidate – rather than in his official capacity, as a president. [More]
Speaking of acting in a private capacity, how is that not what election interference apparatchik Smith is doing, and why can’t (haven’t) Republicans and SCOTUS put an immediate halt to it?
Trump indicted again in election subversion case brought by Jack Smith [More]
Whatever happened to “Jack Smith has no legal authorization“?
Jack Smith Admits FBI Doctored Evidence to Produce Stunt Photos of Classified Docs During Mar-a-Lago Raid [More]
And don’t forget the lies of omission!
[Via Michael G]
Trump classified docs judge expands hearing to consider ‘unlawful’ appointment of special counsel Jack Smith – Judge Aileen Cannon will allow amici to make arguments [More]
You’d better believe she’s a target and the Democrats are furiously digging for something … anything to destroy her with.
Catty CNN is planting the “incompetence” seed.
I’ll take Mark W. Smith’s read on this over Tierney Sneed’s and Hannah Rabinowitz’s, any day…
[Via Jess]
This is a true BOMBSHELL. Everyone who wants to hear the truth about this witch hunt, to get President Trump, must listen to this video by Julie Kelly explaining what Judge Canon released yesterday. Jack Smith is cornered. [More]
So the entire Deep State is now just gonna give up?
Don’t get me wrong– my cynicism is not directed toward people revealing truths. It’s that this isn’t screaming headlines everywhere, and will be suppressed from all who don’t follow “alternative media.”
[Via bondmen]
Related UPDATE
[Via Michael G]
Democrats Celebrate How Biased the Jury in D.C. Will Be [More]
Expect the same if the Committee ever puts you on trial.
Me, I’m wondering if there’s ever been a bigger punk than Lawrence O’Donnell.
[Via Michael G]
Jack Smith Wants Judge to Exclude Trump’s January 6 Evidence From Trump’s January 6 Trial [More]
Reminds me of the Wayne Fincher trial, where the judge wouldn’t let him argue the Constitution and Second Amendment…
Cut through all the crap and what we have here is administration loyalists prosecuting Joe Biden’s political opponent on the premise that HE’s the one interfering with elections.
[Via Michael G]
The report suggests a double standard of justice. While there will reportedly be no consequences for Biden, Special Counsel Jack Smith indicted former President Donald Trump in June for mishandling classified documents. [More]
Ya think…?
If they go after him on it, Democrats know such a charge would almost certainly make it to the Supreme Court. Considering all the complications the Bruen text, history, and tradition standard is throwing in the path of gun prohibitionists in the inferior courts, such charges – like those against Hunter Biden – could very well find such edicts unlawful violations of the Second Amendment. [More]
Special Counsel Jack Smith makes a threat his masters may be afraid for him to make good on.
