Len Savage emailed Director Cekada:


Original post: ATF Statement in Rare Breed Trigger Litigation Raises Questions on Legal Authority
Notes from the Resistance
Len Savage emailed Director Cekada:


Original post: ATF Statement in Rare Breed Trigger Litigation Raises Questions on Legal Authority
ATF Director Says Violent Criminals Are Agency’s Priority, Not Lawful Gun Owners [Watch]
Yeah, about that:
We condemn any program that involves enforcing unconstitutional “laws”, even if such “laws” are enforced only against violent criminals. Unconstitutional “laws” are illegal, harmful to public safety, tyrannical, and are inevitably enforced against ordinary, non-criminal citizens.
As for the laws they break that aren’t unconstitutional, none of those are within the purview of ATF.
Many “conservatives” revere any Trump administration policy as if Moses himself had carried it down from Mount Sinai. [More]
If I go by my own experience, Darwin can expect angry missives from MAGA über alles types demanding to know if he would rather have Kamala and canceling subscriptions in 3…2..1…
ATF Director: Adamiak’s sentence “excessive” [More]
As previously noted, he’s missing the point.
But what I want to focus on is this business of ATF Firearm Enforcement Officer Jeffrey Bodell spreading falsehoods under oath to affect trial outcomes, and how is that anything but prejudicial perjury? Everybody realizes ATF has been getting away with that for years right?
But don’t take my word for it:

“Cekada promised neither he nor the ATF will be ‘offended by the outcome of the courts,’ because he wants to make sure that Adamiak was ‘appropriately sentenced’,” Williams recounted. That’s mighty big of him. However, Second Amendment advocates should be offended by such a presumptuous response. [More]
Focusing on the punishment being too harsh ignores the intolerable injustice of there being any punishment at all.
Cekada promised neither he nor the ATF will be “offended by the outcome of the courts,” because he wants to make sure that Adamiak was “appropriately sentenced.” [More]
That’s mighty big of him. Told ya the guy was our BFF!
ATF Director Robert Cekada: Second Amendment Created to Allow Citizens to ‘Protect Themselves from a Tyrannical Government’ [More]
I’d be more impressed if he’d been able to quote it (Go to 58:23).
[Via bondmen]
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Director Robert Cekada testified on firearms policy and Second Amendment protections before the House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement. [Watch]
And Rep. Eli Crane asked him about Patrick “Tate” Adamiak.
Tate Adamiak’s letter to the new ATF director – Adamiak explains his case better than anyone else could. [More]
Should work.
After all, he’s one of us.
EXCLUSIVE — ATF Director Robert Cekada: Hunter, AR-15 Owner, and Fan of an Armed Citizenry [More]
The Senate confirmed President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives with some Democratic backing on Wednesday, as the new director unveiled plans to roll back Biden-era firearms regulations. [More]
NSSF doesn’t just applaud, it celebrates.
Seems kind of an over-reaction…
Everybody realizes this will go away if Democrats take all…
Rogue ATF Defies Federal Courts, Continues To Target Law-Abiding Gun Owners Over ‘Illegal’ Pistol Brace Rule [More]
But…but…but Cekada:
“NSSF-Supported ATF Director Nominee Cekada Questioned at Senate Hearing, Vows ‘Not to Burden Law-Abiding Gun Owners’” the National Shooting Sports Foundation effused… the American Suppressor Association weighed in. “If confirmed, he would be the first ever truly pro-Second Amendment nominee to head the agency.”
[Via bondmen]
It is definitely time for ATF new leadership to take responsibility for Adamiak’s false arrest, fictitious prosecution and undeserved incarceration. [More]
After all, Cekada IS “the first ever truly pro-Second Amendment nominee to head the agency.” Our “gun rights leaders have told us so!

Noting the legal environment the nominee is part of and stepping into, he’s as good as we’re going to get, but hardly measures up to the superlatives of being “truly pro-Second Amendment.” [More]
Some refuse to accept the parameters being defined for them, “don’t believe in the no-win scenario,” and don’t consider a writhing platter of gagh to be a gourmet meal.