Tag: bump stocks

Next…

After Glock Redesign, Leading Gun-Control Group Calls on Ruger to Discontinue Popular Pistol [More]

Their turn in the barrel, eh? That’s the problem with feeding a circling pack of jackals instead of repelling it. All it does is encourage them to move in closer.

And as for AR-15s being next, that’s a big reason reason I felt compelled to get involved in the bump stock fight:

Who thinks the gun-grabbers won’t use that to further their goal of banning all such guns?

As I told more than one surrender monkey moron:

If anyone believes this is just about “bump stocks” they haven’t been paying attention…

And if anyone tells you it was all about strategic 3D chess, feel free to question their priorities and incentives.

Never forget the goal, laid out for us not by our words but by theirs.

[Via CP]

As Threats Go…

From a “guntuber”:

Are your guns about to be banned? The federal government is pushing the GOSAFE Act, the BUMP Act, and the Assault Weapons Ban of 2025—and together, they represent the biggest threat to the Second Amendment we’ve seen in years.

Hyperbole much?

None has a chance of passing even the House.

And yes, no link was intentional.

[Via Jess]

New Bump Stock Ban: Fitzpatrick Gets Away with Gun Grabs Because Republicans Allow It

The GOP needs to understand, in no uncertain terms, that embedded Democrats are unacceptable, and the Party must do a better job of reining in politicos who want to go left. [More]

Donald Trump should instruct Party shakers and movers to find an acceptable replacement and give enemy-in-the-gates Fitzpatrick the boot.

Ask Mr. Know-It-All

Most Americans Can’t Answer These Simple Gun Law Questions [More]

Including, evidently, the author:

12. Question: Bump stocks are frequently in the news. Are they legal? Answer: No. While bump stocks are still found in the wild, they have been federally banned since 2018. The popularity of this weapon enhancement enables a semiautomatic rifle to fire rapidly, and its use has been under a microscope after being used in several mass shootings in recent years.

Yeah, what’s this?

And “several”? Source? Y0u’re sure?

I typically don’t link to these MSN slide shows because they’re basically bait to get you to click on a dozen pages when all the content really calls for is one. That, and I found other “answers” less than correct and complete.

[Via Dan Gifford]

ATF Up to Old Tricks in Denying Attorney Fees on Bump Stock Case

If you want to fight for your rights against the unlimited power and treasure of the state, you’re on your own. That’s “the reasonableness of the government’s position.” [More]

We’re about to find out how different the new administration is from the old one when it comes to citizens being forced to fight for their rights.

Stiffed on the Bill

The Gun Owners of America were denied in their efforts to collect a $400,000 attorney fee in their successful work in challenging ATF’s bumpstock case. [More]

When writing an update on my case, I made a mistake on the title of my piece that is misleading. The judge’s order, as the text of the article states, was that “the plaintiffs shall file any motion for attorney’s fees.”

I signed a declaration for that last week to allow for the attorneys to submit their claim. We’ll now see if the ATF/DOJ under Trump still intends to fight gun owners tooth and nail.

[Via Jess]

Fighting Fire with Slide Fire

Today, Gun Owners of America announced its support for a lawsuit brought forth by Slide Fire Solutions against the U.S. government, which challenges the 2018 ban and unconstitutional confiscation of bump stocks under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [More]

If any others want to come forward and file complaints, I’ll attest to this, with signatures to prove who I met with:

I asked if anyone else had come to reclaim their property and was told I was the only one, that others had forfeited theirs, and that one business that had made stocks wrote the loss off on taxes.

[Via Jess]

The More the Merrier

Welcome to the party, pals!

[Via Jess]

Prohibitionists Gonna Prohibit

To amend sections 2923.13 and 2923.14 and to enact section 2923.133 of the Revised Code to prohibit certain conduct regarding trigger cranks, bumpfire devices, and other items that accelerate a semi-automatic firearm’s rate of fire but do not convert it into an automatic firearm. [More]

I didn’t just get mine back to surrender it to these two @$$holes.

Come and take it.

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights