Breeding Contempt

You might be asking, can a lawmaker be held in contempt? The answer is absolutely. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the Judiciary Act of 1789 authorizes federal courts to punish contempt by fine or imprisonment. [More]

So who will prosecute that?

Thing is, I suspect speech and debate privileges will preclude going after politicians, and it’s the laws and its enforcers that need to be gone after. Any lawyers competent in this area care to weigh in?

[Via 1Gat]

We’re the Only Ones Threatening Enough

According to a probable cause statement obtained by FOX 2, hundreds of children and adults attended the October 2023 trunk-or-treat event. McCulloch aggressively approached attendees and made statements like “you are all going to die” before one witness shoved him. The probable cause statement states that after McCulloch fell to the ground, he pulled out a handgun and badge, began shooting in an upward direction, and shouted that attendees would die. At some point, several witnesses tackled McCulloch, authorities seized the weapon, and he was taken into custody. [More]

So, they’d have been justified to shoot his punk @$$…

And they knew the nepocop who got on the force because of (Democrat) Prosecutor Dad was a headcase but unleashed him on the public anyway…

[Via bondmen]

We’re the Only Ones Informative Enough

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Release Full Manifesto from Matthew Livelsberger: “This was Not a Terrorist Attack; It is a Wake-Up Call” [More]

Funny, how accomodating they are with stuff they want released, and how clammed up authorities get with stuff they don’t.

It’s almost like we’re being fed a narrative or something…

[Via bondmen]

If We Can’t Believe a Premeditated Oath Breaker, Who CAN We Believe?

But Williams wants to let his former comrades know “a faggot is doing this to them.” He thinks his story could be his most effective weapon. [More]

Not to mention a proven liar, out to try and ruin lives for personal motivations that appear to reflect on him more than they do on actionable lawbreaking….

Just like what appears to be more of a smear job than investigative reporting does on Pro Publica.

It does touch on what I considered to be Oath Keepers’ greatest vulnerability: Involving itself in actions that strayed from what the controllers feared the most: its mission to educate enforcers about orders not to obey and why.

I’ll also say that some of the names I’m seeing representing new leadership were never included in the many emails I still have with old leadership.

[Via DDS]

Unsecuring the Blessings of Liberty

Because alleged domestic abusers pose a clear threat of violence, the measure is constitutional under the high court’s United States v. Rahimi ruling, Judge Jerry E. Smith said for the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [More]

If they’re “alleged,” that hasn’t been proven and depriving them of their rights is tyranny.

If it has been proven that they pose a clear threat, leaving them free to victimize is unconscionable.

Any government that would do this to its citizens has delegitimized itself.

[Via Jess]

Three Thousand Tyrants

With ‘the best friend gun owners have ever had in the White House’ to return, gun-safety groups eye state level actions [More]

Everybody remembers the Benjamin Martin quote, right?

Which is exactly why this needs to be a priority:

Imagine now the Department of Justice under an actual Second Amendment advocate, and what it could do fighting infringements and prohibitionist lawfare waged by states with unlimited tax war chests in tandem with Astroturf prohibitionist groups funded by antigun elites. Right now, the costs to defend against these innumerable assaults on all levels are borne by gun rights groups and members of mostly modest means who can only support a fraction of what is needed. That equation could be turned on its head.

If it’s not, we’ll know our best friend conned us and our “gun rights leaders” never asked him for it.

[Via Jess]

The Silent Horror

Facebook and Instagram Ads Push Gun Silencers Disguised as Car Parts – A network of Facebook pages has been advertising “fuel filters” that are actually meant to be used as silencers, which are heavily regulated by US law. Even US military officials are concerned. [More]

Mehrotra, eh…?

I keep going back to the last paragraph.

And Wired being ultimately controlled by the same billionaire who profits from Teen Vogue’s anal sex tips for teens

Why do I have the feeling that if fuel filters were being used for something else it wouldn’t be a story?

[Via Michael G]

Verified by MonsterInsights