Category: Only Ones

If ‘Ifs’ and ‘Buts’ were Candy and Nuts

If the FBI won’t submit to the legislative branch’s oversight, Congress can take away its guns and its jurisdiction. [More]

I’m sorry, I know we’re being provided with unique information with past precedent that’s been dug out for us, and I agree with the sentiment, but my first thought on reading this was “If wishes were fishes we’d all cast nets.”

There’s no way totalitarian Democrats relying on an apparatchik spy and intimidation network and dolt “law and order” Republicans would ever consider such a thing.

And it’s not like the “Only Ones” have exactly established a track record of justice and trust.

[Via bondmen]

We’re the Only Ones Falsifying Enough

The officers filed more than 26,000 completely falsified traffic tickets, as well as more than 32,000 tickets with inaccurate information into the racial profiling system. The study suggests this was done to bolster their own careers, with additional benefits offered to highly productive officers. [More]

Yeah, back the blue…

After all, it’s only a few bad apples…

Armed bad apples, with qualified immunity if they decide you didn’t obey them fast or servilely enough

[Via Michael G]

We’re the Only Ones Stepping On Enough

A federal judge has found that a Kansas Highway Patrol practice known as the “Kansas Two-Step” violates motorists’ constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and targets motorists traveling from states where marijuana is legal. [More]

And if you don’t obey they’ll escalate to double-taps.

[Via Michael G]

Return With Us Once More to Those Thrilling Days of Yesteryear

In Friday’s post about The Lone Ranger, I neglected to mention something that further illustrates what an inconsistent dolt Joe Biden is.

From my earlier AmmoLand article on “shoot to wound,” quoting Force Science Institute:

“When Michael Paladino, president of New York’s Detectives Endowment Association, showed [Biden] the bill he reportedly scoffed and suggested that it be called the ‘John Wayne Bill’ because of the unrealistic, movie-like sharpshooting skills it demands of officers.”

So when did he decide the new police standard should be leg shots?

We’re the Only Ones Expelling Enough

It’s unknown what brought the officer there, but a probable cause statement said Davis “…deactivated his body-worn camera, did not inform the dispatcher he had a suspect in custody, and instead drove the victim to a remote location… There, the officer pepper sprayed the victim, struck him repeatedly with a baton, and ordered him not to return to the City of Northwoods.” [More]

“Practically never” isn’t good enough.

[Via bondmen]

Just Like the Framers Intended

If it sounds like these authors, Guha Krishnamurthi (University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law) and Peter Salib (University of Houston Law Center) are hinting that cops just violate second amendment rights under the color of law based on the protections police enjoy virtually everywhere and in most, if not all, circumstances, you’d be wrong. They say, “The officer’s justifications may conflict with the federal courts’ understanding of Bruen or the Second Amendment—perhaps flagrantly.” [More]

Funny… if they’re going to override Bruen, they don’t cite any Founding Era text, history, and traditions for enforcer supremacy over citizens’ unalienable rights…

Speaking of which, you’d think ol’ Guha would know better than to side with the Red Coats…

Verified by MonsterInsights