Category: “settled science”

That’s One Way around the SCOTUS Ruling

Report: 44 Percent of Pregnant Women in Pfizer Trial Lost Their Babies; FDA and CDC Recommended Jabs For Expectant Mothers Anyway [More]

And as yet unknown and may take decades to sort out: The effects on the babies who survive.

Assuming we don’t destroy ourselves and the right victors emerge, it would be interesting to read a future history book about this.

[Via Michael G]

And Thank You for Your Service

Attorney R. Davis Younts told Just the News the new CDC guidance won’t change military mandates “but absolutely should. [More]

Especially considering what could happen:

“If they are tried and convicted in the appeals court, the case reaches the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. If a service member is convicted in this court, they would likely receive a dishonorable discharge, a bad-conduct discharge, or, in the case of an officer, a dismissal.”

And you know what that would mean.

Probing for a Vulnerability

The head of the preeminent scientific journal The Lancet’s COVID-19 origins Commission is ‘convinced’ that the virus came out of a lab and says that a real investigation is being blocked. [More]

Quick– what can we find to discredit him? Barring any easily disprovable accusations, we can always fall back on him being white, and therefore a de facto racist.

Oh, crap, he’s a Bernie supporter. Now, what do we do?

Maybe we can exploit the fact that he’s married to a woman…

[Via bondmen]

Trust the ‘Science’?

Images in the paper that were supposed to show the relationship between memory issues and the presence of Aβ*56 appeared to have been altered. [More]

Fraud, eh? And damn the consequences? So does this mean we should be suspicious of every finding that supports a political agenda where some people stand to make out big?

Covid?

“Climate change”?

“Gun safety research”…?

Unbalanced Books

“This epidemic is costing our nation $557 billion annually,” says Sarah Burd-Sharps, research director at the gun control advocacy group. “Looking at the economic consequence offers a wider lens for understanding just how extensive — and expensive — this crisis is.” [More]

Oh, heck, it costs a lot more than that if you add how the overwhelming majority of perps have been subsidized parasites to predators from cradle to grave.

Funny though– they never seem to want to factor in benefits accrued through lives saved by defensive gun uses…

[Via 1Gat]

‘Progressive Science’: Provocatively-Dressed Women Invite Rape

A new study finds concealed carry laws lead to a boost in gun crime by between 29% and 32%, mostly by triggering a surge in gun theft. [More]

As long as acceptable scientific methods include blaming the victim and drawing unsubstantiated correlation/causation conclusions…

Besides, I’m only trying to exhibit some tolerance and inclusion here…

[Via Remarks]

 

 

Wrong-Thinking is Punishable

Board of Health calls commissioner’s comments an ‘embarrassment’ [More]

The embarrassment should be on those holding the inquisition and demanding those they fraudulently smear as heretics recant.

Where they attribute “inequities” to “systemic racism,” an impartial analysis might call personal lifestyle choices to attention, and what they call “gun violence” is just a calculated violence monopolist propaganda point.

I figured out what this “board” reminds me of.

[Via Mack H]

‘First Step’ Admission Points to Chronic Gun Prohibitionist Tactic

So background checks aren’t enough. The prohibitionists want more. They’ll take what they can get now in increments, but once that beachhead has been secured, they’ll use it to launch their next attack into deeper territory. That’s forever been their M.O., something you’d think even an establishment Republican would be smart enough to realize before signing onto any more “bipartisan deals.” [More]

The first step for grabbers is to lie.

Verified by MonsterInsights