We’re the Only Ones Unhelpful Enough

A 48-year-old man was killed and a Philadelphia Police officer has been pulled from street duty for not offering aid to the man who was killed… The officer involved has served for two years, according to police, but authorities have not released his name. [More]

“Served”? How?

“Pulled from street duty”? Not identified and fired, with termination details preventing him from getting a job with any other department?

If there’s no duty to protect or even to respond, what are they good for?

[Via Steve T]

We’re the Only Ones Busting Ass Enough

The post claims officers attempted to use a Taser on the donkey before one officer ultimately shot and killed him… Authorities have not released the identity of the officer who fired the fatal shot. Officials also have not provided details explaining what prompted officers to view HeeHaw as a threat or why deadly force was used. [More]

I can’t think of a single mitigating reason why this shouldn’t define these asses for the rest of their lives.

[Via WiscoDave]

A ‘Pro-Gun Democrat’

In a 2016 interview, Latin Grammy Award-winning artist and Democratic congressional candidate Bobby Pulido defended a fellow singer against criticism for a graphic music video that depicted acts of sexual violence and murder. In the video production of “Fuiste Mía” or “You were mine” by Gerardo Ortiz, a singer walks in on his girlfriend cheating on him. After shooting her lover, he then handcuffs her to a pole, blindfolds her, and gropes her before putting her in the trunk of his car and setting it on fire. [More]

Hey, what’s the big deal? He’s “one of us” isn’t he?

That must be why he embraces this guy:

If shooting guns were the only criteria, we’d have no better pal than Lon Horiuchi.

Based on who else they help attain political power, there ARE no “Pro-Second Amendment” Democrats.

Which makes me wonder what the hell NRA is doing endorsing one after she had come out for Joe Biden. Have they learned nothing with Kirsten Gillibrand? John Dingell? Hary Reid? Jon Tester? Bart Stupak…?

None Dare Call It Megalomania

Kathy Hochul defended her state’s ban on 3D-printed guns, saying, “I’m going to be the one who says no.” [More]

Note the way she equates all citizens determined to exercise rights she has no legitimate claim to with “someone in their kitchen who may have severe mental health problems who wants to shoot up kids in your school.”

It sounds like the severe mental problems are hers– especially if she believes she can stop those determined citizens.

Grant/Viramontes Brief of the Petitioners

Whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to possess AR-15 platform and similar semiautomatic rifles. [More]

You know the answer to that and I know the answer to that.

The question isn’t so much how many Supreme Court Justices know the answer to that as how many will not willingly subvert the Constitution and betray their countrymen?

At First Glance

At a glance, my father looks like the last guy who’d ever want a gun. He is Jewish, an immigrant, a politically liberal city dweller. He didn’t grow up around guns. Most of all, he believed America needed stricter gun control laws. In fact, on many occasions, my father had referred to gun owners as crazy. But I had spent the previous five years studying American gun culture, and I had seen first hand that my father’s position was not so unusual. [More]

Go ahead and make my points for me.

If your father had a clue, he’d be the first guy to want a gun.

With the newsraper of record backing off of confiscation demands and grudgingly mentioning (but not accepting) self-defense utility, I’m starting to sense a pattern here, like with our bud G. Anteus. The grabbers are betting on SCOTUS taking ARs off the table (for now) and are setting up the field for a legislative fallback agenda until such time as they can oust Republican majorities and get back on plan.

O Canada

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation on Thursday defended an internal memo directing its reporters and editors to refrain from describing the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks as “terrorist attacks,” telling Fox News Digital the guidance reflected its longstanding practice of attributing terms it considers politically and emotionally loaded. [More]

The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect, eh?

With Friends Like These

After explaining why United States v. Miller protects arms with a reasonable relationship to militia efficiency, the brief declares that the “general consensus” is that automatic weapons are not protected. [More]

Is he a friend?

Or does he see which way the wind is blowing and is trying to secure the main infringement?

Enemy, Foreign and Domestic

Mamdani posts emotional message mourning accused knife-wielding killer —and is slammed by victim’s family… The inmate was identified as 41-year-old Clarence Woodward, an ex-con with nearly 30 arrests on his rap sheet, who was found unresponsive in his cell shortly after 5 a.m. Tuesday while awaiting trial for murder in the gruesome 2024 attack at a Bronx laundromat. [More]

Knowing the constituency he appeals to, is it any wonder this Marxist immigrant wants to ban your guns?

Another Stark Reminder

Received via email:

Nrastark

He wants to know and he still hasn’t gotten back to me on this…?

Image

I’d like to know before I show up to promote the keystone right only to be told I can’t be armed if I need to go inside any buildings… and for the “reformed” NRA with pledges of a new transparency, it looks like the same old avoidance/ignoring of unwanted questions persists.

Much Ado About…What, Exactly?

The NFA Ruling That Changes Everything—And Changes Nothing… Every advance we have made toward restoring the Second Amendment has been within a framework that the government built and can rebuild. [More]

That, and where’s the “guidance” on home-builds, private transfers, gun trusts, SOTs, interstate travel, sentence enhancements…?

Yeah, I know, I know, would I rather have Kamala…?

Cuccinelli to Argue Militia Clause Protects AR-15s in Supreme Court Brief

300blk LaRue Tactical AR Pistol 768x432

“That is the focus I would bring to an amicus brief: establishing a constitutional principle that not only prevents ‘military’ characteristics from becoming a constitutional liability, but makes them an affirmative basis for protection.” [More]

The Framers put the prefatory clause in there for a reason.

Luck of the Draw

Suspension of Couple’s Gun Rights Because Their College Student Daughter Drew Allegedly Threatening Images Violated Second Amendment [More]

Jeez, if that’s all it takes, I’ve drawn threatening “gun violence” images:

Atfdraw

Cafarella recommended to then-Sgt. Russell that Plaintiffs sign an acknowledgement of wrongdoing as a condition of having their licenses reinstated. [More]

Good thing I don’t have any licenses to revoke for parasites like this character to attach themselves to.

Nassau again…

That’s pretty good slop their hogs have their snouts in.