Notes from the Resistance
Morales began the segment by explaining Schiff is not only campaigning against Republican Steve Garvey, but also “focused on another opponent,” that opponent, unsurprisingly, being Trump. [More]
So how is this not a free campaign ad, reportable to the FEC?
And anybody else wishing one of those mountain lions or bears he was prattling on about had made a surprise appearance…?
[Via Michael G]
Ties Between Judge Merchan’s “Child” and Adam Schiff Represent Major Conflict in Hush Money Trial – Loren Merchan’s firm was paid $4 million by Adam Schiff at the same time he conspired with Michael Cohen to take down Donald Trump. Cohen will be a witness in Judge Merchan’s courtroom next month. [More]
It’s in-your-face blatant. And it’s election interference.
There’s something especially disgusting about a lawyer who betrays attorney/client privilege that puts him in fitting company with Schiff and Merchan.
[Via Michael G]
Russia Hoaxer Adam Schiff Says He Hopes Intel Community Will Hide Info From Trump [More]
This, of course, is SOP for Democrats, who have no problem breaking the law when it suits them, but froth at the mouth and demand crucifixions should those they hate do something similar.
Case in point, this article at WND:
No election certification if Trump wins, majority of Dems insist. Party would simply not finish constitutional election process.
Don’t count on any of their cult members to do anything but make excuses and counter-accusations. It certainly won’t change any minds, no doubt because thinking is a very different process than feeling.
[Via Michael G]
‘Blood Money’: Meet Adam Schiff, Who Looks Away from the Deadly Fentanyl Crisis in His Backyard While Taking Donations from Money Laundering Operators Tied to the Drug Trade [More]
Still, that might explain something…
[Via Michael G]
GOP Squish Caucus Saves Evil Adam Schiff From Being Censured [More]
They really are doing their damnedest to douse and fire in bellies for ’24. And would it be too much to name them and save the rest of us the time?
Anyway, it’s consistent with what we’ve come to expect.
[Via Michael G]
UPDATE
I gotta say, the Yeas and Nays confuse me, as do some of the names I see. So if they voted “Yea” they were against the resolution?
Is Thomas Massie right? What’s that assessment based on, speech or debate?
This is how this moron sees himself. The ratioing is how everyone else sees him. [More]
Interesting though, him lauding armed insurrectionists rebelling against the government.
“The allegations against Porter include claims that she dumped hot potatoes on her then-husband’s head and smashed a glass that led to him being cut by flying shards.” [More]
We can end potato violence!
By publicly pressuring Musk to censor “hate speech,” which is indisputably covered by the First Amendment, Schiff and Takano are trying to indirectly accomplish something that the Constitution forbids. [More]
Well, it also says “shall not be infringed, but that’s never stopped either of these @$$holes.
It’s not like Congress can’t protect identities when there is a legitimate reason while retaining the power to compel testimony under oath. To assume Schiff and fellow Democrats are the only ones who can be trusted is an obvious political move to keep claims from being verified while the freedom of citizens hangs in the balance. [More]
The press being watchdogs was supposed to mean for the people, not for the ruling elites.
SCHIFF BILL TO REPEAL GUN INDUSTRY LIABILITY SHIELD PASSED OUT OF COMMITTEE [More]
It’s instructive to see that the goal really is total disarmament, but the creepy punk is just whoring for headlines here and knows this isn’t going anywhere:
Cosponsors: 72 Cosponsors (72 Democrats)
Prognosis2% chance of being enacted according to Skopos Labs
Figures he and his fellow seditious conspirators put the term “Equal Access” in the title of a bill designed to make guns too expensive for “those people.”
“BREAKING: Schiff files amendment to NDAA that would conceal any info collected by the U.S. military for use in congressional investigations or court proceedings. Massive attempted coverup of enormous proportions and preemptive power grab to prevent GOP oversight next year… [More]
So much for being subordinate to civilian authority. With a blank check like that, what orders won’t the standing army obey?
What do authoritarians always ask us?
If you’re not doing anything wrong, what have you got to hide…?
[Via Michael G]
