Alabama Couple Awarded $1 Million Over Warrantless Raid Of Their House That Saw Cops Walk Off With All Their Cash [More]
But the victims haven’t been paid and it won’t come out of the criminal enforcers’ pockets?
[Via Michael G]
Notes from the Resistance
Indiana Supreme Court Rules Property Owners in Civil Forfeiture Cases are Entitled to a Jury Trial [More]
Better than nothin’, I suppose…
The Catch-22 being, if they have property they won’t qualify for a public defender and will be forced to risk complete ruin trying to recover what was stolen… Meanwhile, the thieves get all legal expenses paid “courtesy” of unlimited hostage plunder.
I still want me one of them Leathermans…
[Via Michael G]
A sex abuse victim is fighting Mint Hill police for $69,000 she says is owed to her. A WCNC Charlotte ‘Where’s the Money?’ investigation tracked down what the money was used for. [More]
For whatever reason, the story link provided results in “404 The page you are looking for can’t be found.”
Wayback Machine to the rescue!
Now 17, the high school senior is waiting for the Mint Hill Police Department to comply with a court order and turn over the $69,130 officers seized from her abuser. The department refuses.
Hey, “Always Think Forfeiture,” right?
If they’re going to keep the money, the least they could do is pay for the coffee, although with the way comments are going, it may be prudent to cancel future community social meets…
[Via Michael G]
FBI sued after allegedly losing hundreds of thousands in rare coins during raid [More]
That’s what happens when thieving bastards are used to getting away with it.
Finally, something I can agree with Jamie Raskin on.
So what the hell’s the hold-up?
[Via Michael G]
Atlanta resident now owes twice the money taken from him after the government loses forfeiture case [More]
What was the history, text, and tradition on asset forfeiture without charges, trial, and conviction at the time the Founders wrote a primary purpose for their compact was “to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”?
And even before that…?
[Via Michael G]
A federal circuit judge writes that Detroit’s vehicle seizure scheme “is simply a money-making venture—one most often used to extort money from those who can least afford it.” [More]
So I guess that means no Leatherman tools…?
[Via Michael G]
She successfully navigated the administrative process at the DEA, but when prosecutors filed a forfeiture action in federal court she missed the deadline to file one required piece of paper. That was enough for the government to take her money forever. [More]
Just like the Founders intended!
Unanimous consent, eh? In this case, getting Black Lives Matter to start an “Anne Milgram is a racist” meme would get them to back down in no time.
I still want to get me one of those Leatherman tools…
[Via Michael G]
Woods gave them permission to search his vehicle. [More]
What have we learned?
And so much for “the palladium of our liberties,” when most jurors might as well be sticking beans up their noses…
[Via Michael G]
Trucking company owner finally gets cash seized through forfeiture [More]
He also ought to get damages. Paid for by the criminals who stole from him under color of authority.
And maybe a commemorative Leatherman tool…
What an evil, un-American practice.
[Via Michael G]
“The government shouldn’t get to take your property if it can’t tell you what you did wrong,” said IJ Attorney Bob Belden. [More]
Nonsense. How else would they be able to afford to award each other Leatherman swag?
[Via Michael G]
“The head of the Albany County Sheriff’s Office business office was charged with grand larceny and five counts of forgery after he allegedly siphoned more than $68,000 from the department’s federal forfeiture funds account and forged Sheriff Craig Apple’s name to cover it up,” Albany’s Times-Union reported last week. “Apple said he believes Cox was using the money to pay off gambling debts.” [More]
He just didn’t know when to fold ’em, when to walk away, and when to run.
[Via Michael G]
What the Richmond Heights ordinance does is require a violator’s gun to be forfeited. [More]
Forfeiture law trumps preemption. So the city says it can take your gun if you’ve had a few drinks in your own home.
Sometimes referred to as “policing for profit,” civil asset forfeiture has become big business, generating significant revenue for the state, local, and federal law enforcement agencies across the country. [More]
I wonder what men who considered a tea tax intolerable and cause for rebellion would have made of all this…
[Via Michael G]