If you want them to be “more afraid of you than you are of them,” shooting them is a good approach. [More]
And it’s remarkably effective against all kinds of predators.
[Via Michael G]
Notes from the Resistance
Wild gun battle on Connecticut street sends dozens running; 3 wounded [More]
That must explain the “-” after the “A.”
What do you want to bet nobody involved is a CCDL member but are instead related to people who vote for Giffords candidates?
[Via Jess]
“We’re patrolling the neighborhood. But we have guns because the Second Amendment says that if you have a license, you are allowed to carry one,” he said. [More]
That’s not what it says at all.
While it’s encouraging to see this, you can’t very well claim rights if you don’t understand them.
Still, I wouldn’t mind seeing the racist implications of Connecticut’s asinine “duty to retreat” exposed.
[Via Jess]
Appeals Court: No First Amendment Right to Religious Exemption From Vaccine Mandate [More]
You must let us experiment on your children or we will take them from you, and if you resist us, we will kill you.
More souls for Moloch, just like the Founders intended.
One of the judges is a Trump appointee, once more underscoring the importance of vetting these bastards before handing them a gavel.
[Via Michael G]
Connecticut State Police troopers may have falsified tens of thousands of traffic stop records submitted to the state’s racial profiling data reporting program, potentially skewing the numbers to reflect more infractions for white drivers and fewer for Black and Hispanic motorists. [More]
I guess it’s OK if you do it to the disfavored.
[Via Steve T]
“Friend was violating no law by standing on the sidewalk and displaying his sign, and [Police Sgt. Richard] Gasparino had no lawful reason to order him to desist from that conduct,” the appeals court ruled. [More]
If he wanted to engage in police-approved speech in Stamford, he should have become a paid gunsnitch.
That said, it’s probably unfair for me to judge Sgt. Gasparino until I’ve goose-stepped a mile in his jackboots.
Kinda helps explain why Connecticut is so hot for unending citizen disarmament schemes…

CCDL RESPONDS TO GOVERNOR LAMONT’S LATEST ROUND OF ANTI-GUN PROPOSALS [More]
An open carry ban and purchase limits — just like the Founders intended.
And no, of course that’s not all the tyrant demands.
Interesting, who these control freaks presume the law is supposed to protect…
When will in-your-face defiance of a coequal branch of government and suppression of unalienable rights be properly considered the insurrectionary seditious conspiracy that it is?
Democrat Gov. Ned Lamont: AR-15s ‘Should Not Be Allowed in the State of Connecticut’- Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont (D) is weighing a push to end or repeal a grandfathering clause in a gun control bill in order to force residents to hand over any AR-15s. [More]
Now ask me how sorry I feel for those who registered theirs via obtaining a certificate of possession.
[Via bondmen]
Senator Chris Murphy: ‘victory after victory’ is coming for US gun safety [More]
And he plans to make places more dangerous until it does.
[Via Jess]
Gov. Ned Lamont said this week that he wants to go after thousands of firearms legally kept in Connecticut under several “grandfather” provisions in the state’s decades-old assault weapons ban… [More]
What, the ones Connecticut gun owners naively registered?
[Via Jess]