The smug “Aren’t we virtuous and tolerant?” look defines these political stool samples and the “No Kings” useful idiots who vote for them.
it comes to what Democrats will vote for, Carville is on to something.
[Via Michael G]
Notes from the Resistance
The smug “Aren’t we virtuous and tolerant?” look defines these political stool samples and the “No Kings” useful idiots who vote for them.
it comes to what Democrats will vote for, Carville is on to something.
[Via Michael G]

Eric Swalwell Says Dems Will Target Private Citizens Who Work With Trump [More]
Really? Organized Democrat lawfare against citizens who don’t back their scams and vote their way?
See, this is the latest Big Lie Dems are pushing– that exposing their political criminality and making them pay for it, while it may be personally satisfying, is still only justice working the way it should. A sense of schadenfreude about karma, and even feeling a rush of revenge for wrongs done, is simply a side benefit of human nature.
Here’s one danger with his threat that seems directly relevant to us– just like the court judgments that assign decision protections to members of gun groups that obtained a judgment, being a member of such groups that support him and his agenda will mean you “worked with Trump.”
Me, I think this treasonous Swalwell f_head ought to be investigated for voter intimidation conspiracy, and if speech or debate clause protections really apply to doing it on CNN (I know about Murtha, but SCOTUS never weighed in). And that in turn reminds me of a write-up I once did concerning an anti-gun Vichycon, centered on this quote from an AP report:
A congressman has no special protection from criminal charges, a federal appeals panel ruled Wednesday in allowing a racketeering and bribery trial for Rep. Joseph M. McDade (R-Pa.). McDade had used the Constitution’s “speech or debate” clause in asking for dismissal of the charges.
An investigation would be a whole lot more orderly and peaceable in the end than having to remind this toad Swalwell that people who feel they’re targeted and have nothing left to lose sometimes target back.
Swalwell campaign continues lavish spending, including at 5-star Dubai resort, luxury car service, yachts [More]
Not to mention “$45,000 on private security”…
About right for a Democrat imposing environmental and personal defense restrictions on the rest of us…
I wonder if Chicom asset Fang Fang gave him more than… you know…
[Via Michael G]
My wife and I play these scenarios over in our head all the time. We’ve practiced going out through the back seat to get our kids out of our car if we are carjacked. [More]
And if the people who don’t obey the citizen disarmament edicts you demand decide not to let you…?
What kind of non-man admits to the world he leaves the safety of his wife and children, to the mercies of predators?
And what about Fang Fang?
Rep. Eric Swalwell Mocks ‘Detective’ James Comer & Dismisses Latest Biden Money Trail Evidence [More]
I only have one question.
[Via Michael G]
[Via bondmen]
A purchase order posted in the city record last week shows that a South Jersey gun dealer is sending the city $91,171.50 in MP5 submachine guns. This follows the department’s $100,000 purchase of 10 sniper rifles earlier this fiscal year. [More]
You know, per Eric Swalwell, “a hand-held weapon of war, capable of spraying a crowd with more lethal fire in seconds.” And the Chicom honey-potted liar was just talking about semi-autos.
With the Rikers population “overrepresented” at “56% Black, 33% Latinx/Hispanic, 7.5% White, and 3.5% Mixed Race,” that means the Democrat administration is prepared to mow down roughly nine times more “people of color.”
Is it me or does that track with the way they vote?
[Via Steve T]
Eric Swalwell roasted on social media after asking why GOP colleague’s ‘gun’ is ‘so small’ [More]
The Fang Fang jokes are writing themselves…
“Please tell me what I’m missing here … This is so stupid.” [More]
MAGA Republicans want women arrested for having an abortion. This is what that looks like. #LockHerUp pic.twitter.com/YUD0swW8DE
— Eric Swalwell (@ericswalwell) October 18, 2022
Brought to you by police state monopoly of violence proponents who want their enforcers to be the “Only Ones” with guns.
In reality, when those are established, the exact opposite occurs.
[Via Jess]
Our Entire Civilization Is Structured Around Keeping Us From Realizing We Can Do This [More]
Gosh, do you think that might have something to do with tyrants incessantly pushing citizen disarmament?
I don’t know why they think they have to, seeing as how they have nukes and everything…
I know: Let’s ask Jamie Raskin!
[Via bondmen]
“And we are not going to stop calling her and her pro-killer colleagues out,” she continued. [More]
This caught my attention more than the headline.
If you oppose infringements on your birthright by the totalitarian violence monopolists, you’re “pro-killer” according to this stupid, evil lying c*** mouthpiece for this stupid, evil lying c***.
These are the people who want to be able to order enforcers to disarm you and kill you if you resist. Think it through and you’ll see that’s not hyperbole.