People Aren’t Complying With Canada’s Gun Grab. Could It Get Ugly? [More]
One can always hope.
I wonder how much Heritage Canadaian blood will be enough for Gary…
[Via Michael G]
Tag: gun confiscation
Rhode Island Reds
And in true pincer strategy fashion, they’re making sure their enforcers will “just follow orders.”
[Via WiscoDave]
A New York State of Mind
“Turn ’em all in, Mr. and Mrs. America,” the demonic hag cackled as she clutched out from hell.
They want ’em all, they want ’em now, and they want ’em delivered.
[Via WiscoDave]
Do You Come from a Land Down Under
Albanese announces gun buyback scheme as NSW moves on gun limits, protest bans – Anthony Albanese said he expects “hundreds of thousands” of guns to be collected and destroyed through the scheme. [More]
That makes him a schemer.
Hey, I figured out who Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett reminds me of.
The Seeds of Rebellion
The Yukon government has formally stated it will not participate in the federal mandatory firearms buyback program, placing the territory among a growing group of provincial and territorial governments resisting Ottawa’s gun control policies. [More]
Welcome to the party, buddies, eh?
Will Carney tighten his grip?
[Via Jess]
In the Spirit of Bipartisanship
Earlier this year, the plaintiff’s wife had been involuntarily admitted to a mental health facility, based on a language-related misunderstanding, resulting in her discharge with a diagnosis of “Adjustment disorder with depressed mood, seven weeks pregnant.” In April of 2025, acting on the information about his wife, the Fort Lee Police Department confiscated Mr. Aliaj’s firearms, ammunition, and related accessories from his home, without presenting any warrant or court order. [More]
Naturally, “the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office was taking the position that his weapons were confiscated under New Jersey’s ‘Duty to Inform’ law,” because Mark Musella is a New Jersey “Republican.”
“Law and order” über alles, right? Especially where “the supreme Law of the Land” is ignored as a matter of course.
[Via Jess]
A New York State of Mind
O Canada
Remember when the RCMP broke into homes of a neighborhood and stole firearms from them, while the owners had evacuated due to flooding? [More]
And:
CBRPS has a cattle coral drive-through set up for licensed owners to turn in their guns for the grab. You don’t get out, you just roll up and officers come to your vehicle to retrieve them. [More]
I remember when Sgt. Preston was the good guy. Now, Dudley Do-Right has transitioned into Snidely Whiplash.
[Via WiscoDave]
Related UPDATE
‘They Broke the Goodwill Contract’: Canada’s Sweeping Firearm Seizure [More]
I guess we’ll see how serious Alberta is.
[Via bondmen]
Do You Come from a Land Down Under?
Australia Police Seize Guns from Dozens of Owners Over Personal “Sovereign Citizen” Statements [More]
True, they don’t have a First or a Second Amendment, but contrary to popular opinion, Australians have a right to free speech and a right to keep and bear arms. Everyone does.
What most don’t have is the will to keep violence monopolists from denying them.
The Plot That Keeps on Thickening
Our story so far:
- Et Tu, CZ?
- Rendering Unto CZ
- CZ the Day
- CZ Denies Involvement in Canada Gun ‘Buyback’
- Stop Me If You’ve Heard This One Before
- The Plot Thickens
- And the Plot Thickens More
Equivocation and avoidance is a funny way of proving you’re “True North Strong,” eh?
[Via Nicholas]
Who’s Infringin’? We’re Confiscatin’
The US Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, has ruled in a case involving a Sheriff’s Department which confiscated 14 guns and has refused to return them to the alleged owners. [Watch]
I’m assuming the claimants did not obtain their firearms through an FFL.
So, if you bought your guns through private sales and you don’t register them with the state, you’re effectively presumed “guilty” until you can prove your “innocence”…? It’s not up to the Only Ones who took them from your home to prove they’re not yours…? And it’s not like the value of the guns is worth a protracted series of battles through the courts.
If I had any guns I bought, say, back in 1977 from a co-worker whose last name I can’t even remember anymore and who may be long dead for all I know, they could take them from me if a guest acted up. The only reasons that could never happen is I don’t know any cowardly bullies with anger management problems and would never allow them in my house if I did, plus, as we’ve long established, I would never own a gun — evil, nasty things things always going around killing people…
[Via Jess]
Asked and Answered
Let’s say Harris had won and the next day signed an executive order banning all guns. How many cops do you think would follow their oath? [More]
Oath Keepers had to be destroyed by those in power. And they had to make sure everyone believed that was for our own good.
[Via WiscoDave]
