Cashing in On Loyalty Rewards

CNN is promoting the journalist Natasha Bertrand, who wrote the 2020 Politico report on intel officials who called the Hunter Biden laptop Russian disinformation. In other words, instead of paying a price for pushing disinformation, she is being rewarded for it. [More]

Well, yeah, because otherwise, she wouldn’t have been a team player.

This is CNN.

[Via Michael G]

Taking a Powder

Hunter Biden’s gun pouch had cocaine residue on it, prosecutors say [More]

Funny… you’d think “commonsense gun safety” groups would want their member to know about this…

[Via Andy M]

Related UPDATE

Hunter Biden Not Protected From Gun Charges by Second Amendment, DOJ Argues [More]

Are they sure…?

Still, it’s interesting that someone at DOJ believes he can be sacrificed…

[Via Jess]

Untrue to Form

EXCLUSIVE: FBI Gun Background Check Database Contains Nearly 14 Million Entries For Illegal Immigrants [More]

S’OK. Hunter’s going to make those unconstitutional.

Plus there’s nothing to stop them from getting ’em the old fashioned way.

Military age men, I’ll bet.

Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue.” And I have that on good authority.

[Via Steven H]

Hunter Biden Second Amendment Defense Could Upend Democrat Agenda on Guns

If Biden’s motion ultimately prevails, other categories of prohibited persons become vulnerable to challenge, as well as records required to be kept by Federal Firearms Licensees, which themselves have no historical counterpart. The possibilities for reclaiming rights seem boundless. [More]

It would be deliciously ironic if, in saving his own skin, this degenerate saved ours…

What’s in a Name?

“Based on the facts and the law, if Hunter’s last name was anything other than Biden, the charges in Delaware, and now in California, would have not been brought,” Lowell said… [More]

Ever the victim, eh?

What if his last name was Taylor?

My spider sense is telling me Democrats know Joe’s jig is up and are upping the signals to his inner circle that it’s time for him to go.

Hunter Biden’s Lawyers are Playing to Supportive Media with ‘Vindictive Prosecution’ Insinuations

“Lawyers for Hunter Biden raised the prospect that he is the victim of ‘vindictive’ prosecution… [More]

And leave it to the “real reporters” to make that what the public takes away from all this.

Back to Square One?

Hunter Biden legal team may need to overhaul defense strategy in gun case [More]

That drives the timing on resurrecting one FOIA and pressing one complaint:

And point of order on that “second gun”– the (extremely NSFW!) Marco Polo report, at the top of page 282, claims:

“Five days after he illegally obtained a .38 caliber handgun, Hunter solicited a female to the Red Roof Plus+ in Newark. During the tryst, he posed with what he claimed was a black ‘airgun,’” [further identified in a footnote as a] “PT-80 Semi-Auto .177 Cal. CO2 Pellet Pistol 8 shot magazine from GAMO.”

No?

In any case, I’m interested in finding out if any report raised the question of Biden lying on the 4473 before this one.

[Via Dan Gifford]

So Much for Possession Being Nine-Tenths of the Law…

Hunter Biden, 53, was originally expected to plead guilty to misdemeanor tax counts in an agreement with prosecutors and avoid prosecution on a single gun possession charge related to the 2018 purchase if he stayed clean and out of trouble. [More]

And signed a lifetime “consent to permanent entry” NICS ban, which DOJ has no statutory authority to offer…

Why wouldn’t AP/ABC “real reporters” mention that?

Verified by MonsterInsights