Firearm Suppressor Demand Explodes At Historic Rate [More]
If they’re such a “significant danger,” where’s the proof?
Oh, there isn’t any to justify bans?
And does “silencer-related crimes” mean they were used or just present?
[Via bondmen]
Tag: suppressors
It’s About Time
Vote Stealing While Armed
We’re the Only Ones Securing the Blessings of Liberty One Menacing Extortion Demand at a Time Enough
“You’ve been watching too many shows and reading too many books,” the agents respond. “I’m sure we’ll find you again someday.” [More]
What are “the agents” names? That bullying arrogance needs names and faces attached to it.
Why did he talk to them at all? Any denial that can be proven false is a felony and a lifetime gun ban. They’re obviously trying to entrap him and from what I’m hearing, they may have unless he surreptitiously gets rid of it.
And why does the tab in the USA Today article read “Conspiracy theories abound…” ? What “conspiracy theories” does the “real reporter” document? Or is this just more of what we’ve some to expect from Gannett Publications…?
Funny, how the first heinous act of supprerssor abuse they could come up with to show how they’re too dangerous to trust the public with was:
A former Los Angeles Police Department officer armed with a Glock pistol and AR-15, both affixed with silencers, shot and killed four people in February 2013.
And in any case, they did not establish how the suppressor on the gun made it any more deadly or allowed the perps to get away with it, or had any more effect on what happened than the color shirt the killers wore. Hey, when you have a herd to spook, they’re not apt to sense a correlation/causation logical fallacy.
Sounds of Silence
This New Bill Would Shorten the Suppressor Waiting Period to 90 Days [More]
Oh, look: Master is going to loosen his whip hand.
I’ve got some Chore Boys that’ll shorten it a lot more than that.
It figures the same Fudd community that throws EBR owners under the bus would be all for enforcing and enhancing this Intolerable Act. Here’s the thing: I don’t hunt. To force me to pay prior restraint extortion before I can buy a gun or ammo is no different than a poll tax.
So how else would “we” pay for it?
How about how else would those engaging in those activities pay for it?
That’s where the “laboratory” of different states trying different things would show what works best– on lands outside the District that are not “Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings.”
[Via Jess]
So Come on Down to Kapo Arms
DFADFO
Pander Much?
U.S. Senator Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) led a group of 25 additional Senate colleagues in reintroducing the Hearing Protection Act (HPA). The HPA, S. 401, would reclassify suppressors to regulate them like a regular firearm. The measure would benefit Idaho’s recreational gun users and provide them better access to hearing protection equipment. [More]
Why? Where were you guys when you were the majority?
[Via Jess]
UPDATE
Figures NSSF “proudly welcomes” it.
Ready to Rumble
YouTube Censorship Of Suppressor Content & Wholesale Deletion of Creators [More]
Well, it’s not like the CEO came here for the liberty…
While it’s understandable and necessary to endorse uncensored alternatives like Rumble, the fact remains that I have accounts on Truth Social, Gab, and MeWe and don’t get anywhere near the admittedly limited exposure I get on Facebook and Twitter.
[Via Jess]
We’re the Only Ones Hush-Hush Enough
LAPD detective accused of trying to buy silencer online [More]
So if we’re to believe the commies over at the Center for American Progress (and why wouldn’t we?), he “pose[d] a unique risk to public safety”…?
As an aside, that’s a lot of “Only Ones” groups backing infringements. Remember that the next time some “law-abiding” über alles chump tells you “Back the Blue!” with a straight face.
[Via Steve T]
A Father/Son Business
Prosecutors: Father, son charged with selling silencers had 105 firearms, 13,800 rounds of ammo at home [More]
Citing those has everything to do with scaring and prejudicing the readers.
Tracing things from the indictment to the guy’s website to his other website to his previous website, it looks like he was doing things because of his beliefs.
In any case, he evidently wasn’t doing things very cautiously if the goal was to get away with them. Here’s what Prince Law has to say about solvent traps.
If you were his customer, I’d be calling a lawyer and determining exposure and vulnerability about now.
[Via bondmen]
