USA Today - The War on Guns

Who Puts the Lügen into Presse?

In Opposite Day Logic, USA Today Breathlessly Defends ‘Zuckerbucks’ [More]

Glad to see the term catching on…

And what else would we expect?

[Via Michael G]

Bloody-Handed, Greedy Gun Stores Profiting from Slaughter of Innocents!!!

Gun shops that sell the most guns used in crime revealed in new list [More]

“Real reporter” Nick Penzenstadler and USA Today (A Gannett Publication) said it, I believe it, that settles it.

“Bass Pro Shops and Cabela’s, Rural King and Sportsman’s Warehouse”…?

Hey, I’ll bet more cars from large volume dealers are involved in accidents, too!

Produce one instance where any of the named stores, operating under the threat of surprise “zero tolerance” audits and record/inventory seizures, knowingly sold a firearm to a “prohibited person.” Is it their fault if Hunter Biden walks in and lies on a 4473?

Hey, going after the “law-abiding” who leave records to track has always been easier than tackling the underworld.

What? Gannett didn’t tell us about that? And, in fact, made a point of axing and erasing the one guy who would?

BOHICA ’24

Guns, abortion, voting: New state laws on host of contentious issues take effect this week [More]

Theh thought strikes that “real reporters” KINSEY CROWLEY AND SARA CHERNIKOFF of USA Today (a Gannett Publication) would be right at home writing press releases for Giffords.

And I guess it doesn’t enter what passes for the idiot sign holder’s mind that a man with murder on his mind wouldn’t need a gun, and if he did and she had one, he’d be.

[Via Jess]

Why, Indeed?

Why Raskin wants Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from potential Trump ruling [More]

Because he’s the legacy forwarding heir of a treasonous communist, of course…

Not that the statist apologists at USA Today (a Gannett Publication) will tell you that.

[Via Jess]

We’re the Only Ones Securing the Blessings of Liberty One Menacing Extortion Demand at a Time Enough

“You’ve been watching too many shows and reading too many books,” the agents respond. “I’m sure we’ll find you again someday.” [More]

What are “the agents” names? That bullying arrogance needs names and faces attached to it.

Why did he talk to them at all? Any denial that can be proven false is a felony and a lifetime gun ban. They’re obviously trying to entrap him and from what I’m hearing, they may have unless he surreptitiously gets rid of it.

And why does the tab in the USA Today article read “Conspiracy theories abound…” ? What “conspiracy theories” does the “real reporter” document? Or is this just more of what we’ve some to expect from Gannett Publications…?

Funny, how the first heinous act of supprerssor abuse they could come up with to show how they’re too dangerous to trust the public with was:

A former Los Angeles Police Department officer armed with a Glock pistol and AR-15, both affixed with silencers, shot and killed four people in February 2013.

And in any case, they did not establish how the suppressor on the gun made it any more deadly or allowed the perps to get away with it, or had any more effect on what happened than the color shirt the killers wore. Hey, when you have a herd to spook, they’re not apt to sense a correlation/causation logical fallacy.