Category: citizen disarmament

Lather, Rinse, Repeat

Democratic lawmakers propose campus gun ban to improve safety at Wisconsin colleges [More]

Because nothing says “No Predators Allowed” like Gun-Free Zones!

I don’t suppose Wisconsin Democrats would also require these and have the Party indemnify schools found liable to pay out?

I guess we could ask Kelda…

[Via Mike F]

Give ’em What They Want

And if what they want is you…?

At first I thought I’d posted on this already, but when I checked saw that was just a parroted talking point.

[Via WiscoDave]

We’re the Only Ones Self-Serving Enough

An officer should respect your right to legally carry — but what happens when he gets antsy and gets aggressive with you? In that moment, your heart’s racing, your hands are frozen, and you’re trying to decide if telling him you’re armed will calm him down or make things worse. [Watch]

Yeah, why don’t you consider his feelings for a change?

Right, George?

[Via Jess]

And Leave the Disarming to Us!

US appeals court reverses lower court, approves Illinois ban on carrying firearms on public transit [More]

No doubt when he commutes, Biden appointee Judge Joshua Kolar is “comfortably situated” in a private luxury vehicle and doesn’t need submit himself and his loved ones to this.

[Via Jess]

With Republicans Like These…

Why Has Fort Worth – One of America’s Most Conservative Cities – Hired an Anti-Gun Police Chief? [More]

I’d start by looking at who “Republican” Mayor Mattie Parker joins with “to put aside partisan differences and pass common sense gun safety legislation.”

[Via Michael G]

‘Very Good News’?

[T]he 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has found that machine guns are not protected under the Second Amendment with really a terribly reasoned ruling. But the outcome is the one we want because, as I’ve explained to you before, unequivocally, 100% we 1,000% do not want a machine gun case to go to the United States Supreme Court. Anyone that disagrees with me is 1,000% wrong. If a machine gun case goes to the Supreme Court, we will 1,000% lose, which will create more bad Second Amendment precedent. And it will also delay, as an opportunity cost the decision that AR-15s and semi-automatic rifles are protected arms under the Second Amendment… [Watch]

The fact that his legal read on this is correct should be all the proof we need that the court benches are dominated by traitors.

[Via Jess]

The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship?

Following its amicus brief in support of us, the federal government has asked the Seventh Circuit for approval to participate in oral arguments in our lawsuit challenging Illinois’ “assault weapon” and magazine bans [More]

How could they refuse? After all, “Currently, six of the court’s judges were appointed by Republicans and five by Democrats.”

Yeah, but one of those “Republicans” is treasonous dotard Frank Easterbrook…

[Via Jess]

Judged by 12

Deadly triple shooting at apartment complex stemmed from robbery, Sacramento sheriff says… The sheriff’s office said all four men involved in the shooting had prior felony convictions and were prohibited from possessing guns. [More]

Being on probation with an ankle monitor was a nice touch.

And yeah, he absolutely had a right to defend himself. If they all had been in custodial care where they belong, guns would not have been part of the equation.

Why is it I get the feeling the goal isn’t really to reduce “gun violence”?

[Via DL]

Because We Can’t Call It a ‘Retarded Session’

Walz to call special session on gun control, propose assault weapons ban [More]

What lies must he have told NRA to get its endorsement? Apparently he didn’t have to, since his “unwavering pro-gun support” was based on “sportsmen” and “rich hunting heritage.”

[Via Jess]

Kinzinger Shows More Ignorance on Second Amendment in Lame ‘Gotcha’ Attempt

That Kinzinger is evidently unaware of this (or aware but deliberately lying by omission about it) is no surprise. [More]

Photo caption contest winner: How you can tell Adam Kinzinger is lying.

A Grudging Admission

A Delaware state court struck down the state’s ban on firearms ownership for adults between the ages of 18 and 21, citing the obvious conclusion that such a ban is unconstitutional, just as it would be for any other enumerated right. However, the opinion is wrought with other areas of concern that show the court’s hostility towards Second Amendment rights. [More]

Read the opinion.

[Via Michael G]

Talk is Cheap

Dem MN State Rep.: Not Talking About Assault Weapons Is ‘an Attempt to Politicize’ Grief and Distract [More]

Enough talk.

Flesh out how you’re going to take them from those of us who reject your authority to rob us of our right to keep and bear arms and will resist if you try.

[Via bondmen]

There Once Were Some Dolts from Nantucket

Wealthy enclave’s sewage reveals higher than average cocaine levels in the water [More]

What, “overwhelmingly” Democrat Nantucket?

So, well-heeled “liberals” who vote for “gun control” help finance violent criminal terror cartels and employ criminal illegal aliens…? Reminds me of another overprivileged hypocrite I wrote about after he thoughtfully demonstrated the real world effects of his judgment.

Oregon would have said “Hold our beer” but they were too busy trying to gloss over their mess, not that stupid voters there would ever hold them accountable…

It Just Doesn’t Matter

Minnesota has red flag laws…. But because the killer’s family affirmed his mental illness, there was nothing a gun shop could do. So unless you’re prepared to make transgenderism a diagnosed mental illness, none of that will matter. [More]

Not that red flag laws would stop a determined psycho predator from victimizing others, and the law that would work has zero chance of being enacted.

I’m actually drafting an article about a Democrat school district in California (is there any other kind?) that is taking steps to legally classify objectors as the ones with mental problems. Stay tuned.

[Via Antigone]

Verified by MonsterInsights