Category: citizen disarmament

Thank You, Captains Obvious

Prop 50: A Direct Threat to the Second Amendment [Watch]

Yes, Democrats mean to rule with a monopoly of power, which includes a monopoly of violence, and they’d do whatever it takes and then some. The unanswered question is how did California get this way and what have the gun groups –including CRPA — done to warn citizens and try to stop the root cause, or have they ignored it with a “single issue” excuse?

And will they keep ignoring it in places that have not yet turned because they’re afraid the communists will call them names?

[Via Jess]

Won’t Take ‘No’ for an Answer

How many times do they need to be rejected before they become stalkers?

Actually, it’s not that he doesn’t want to. It’s just that they’re frustrated he can’t satisfy them and are complaining to the neighbors about it.

We’re the Only Ones Infringing Enough

In keeping with the new state requirement that all would-be handgun buyers first acquire a purchase permit, the Delaware State Police have launched a portal for permit applications. Called the “Permit to Purchase Application Portal,” the webpage is used to gather personal information, including name, address, gender, date of birth, email, employment status (including employer info), and race and ethnicity information. [More]

And remember, “law-abiding” gun owners: Back the Blue!

When I think of portals, I don’t think of anything good coming out of the other side.

[Via bondmen]

And They Say There Are No Stupid Questions

Whether Illinois’ flat ban on ordinary citizens carrying firearms on public transportation violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. [More]

That this is even in question shows how far the Republic has degraded from the clear intent understood by the founders as a condition for ratification.

That the big worry now is if SCOTUS will even hear it, and if so, how it will rule, tells us more.

[Via Jess]

One Step Forward and Three Steps Back

Is There a Hidden Meaning in DOJ’s Position on Mag Bans? [Watch]

Let me get this straight: The “pro-gun” DOJ will defend magazines (because they believe bans are unconstitutional or because they think SCOTUS will rule against them?) but still demands license/registration requirements to carry and possess firearms and ammunition…?

If there’s a hidden meaning, they’re not hiding it very well. That seems kind of in-your-face…

And yeah, I’m vulnerable to being sucked in just like most gun owners.

“Full might” my… eye.

Beasts of Burden

“The State bears the burden of proving that its immoral scheme to criminalize rights is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition, and they will fail.” [More]

Actually, unless and until the Supreme Court rules in favor of the uninfringed right of the people to keep and bear arms, the burden will continue to be entirely borne by the state’s victims.

Shall Not Be Infringed UNLESS…?

Viramontes’s criticism of Bevis on this point carries little weight, given Heller’s holding that “the Second Amendment does not protect those weapons not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes[.]” Id. at 625. Heller did not hold, as Viramontes seems to imply, that military-style weapons are protected “arms” because military action by civilians is lawful. Instead, Heller characterized self-defense as the “core lawful purpose” of firearm use. 554 U.S. at 630. [More]

I beg to differ. And have warned that ignoring the militia aspect would be used against us.

Funny, how a common prohibitionist argument is that 2A advocates ignore the first 13 words, and here it is they’re doing just that in their legal argument.

In any case, the amendment says “arms.” And as for the contention that its ban “finds support in this nation’s history and tradition,” tell that to Tench Coxe.

F-n’ lying Illinois Democrats…

[Via Jess]

Extortionists for Gun Safety

Maryland Dem state senator charged with extortion after feds say she recorded foe in bed with married man [More]

But that doesn’t mean we can’t trust her on citizen disarmament, does it…?

Great people, these Democratic politicians.

And maybe stamina-challenged “Only One of the Month” Finklestein can frame his termination notice to hang next to his plaque.

Our Last, Best Hope

“MAGA Friends…Imagine Who Gets Killed When President AOC Says it Doesn’t Matter What the Law Says” – WHOA! Democrat Rep. Implies Future Leftist President Could KILL GOP Voters [More]

There are still people this is a revelation to? That’s why when they talk about taking our guns, some of us say “I will not comply.”

[Via bondmen]

How Can We Be Expected to Know Who NOT to Persecute?

This Court enjoined Defendant from enforcing the challenged federal criminal and regulatory provisions as to the organizational Plaintiffs, but Defendant does not know to whom the injunction applies because membership information is exclusively within the possession and control of the organizational Plaintiffs, who do not want to share it with the federal government. [More]

Mean old gun rights groups!

What part of “the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” does AG Bondi not understand?

[Via Jess]

A Matter of Degree?

Critics accuse Cornyn of capitulating to Democrats’ gun control demands — even though the bill largely did not restrict gun owner’s existing rights. [More]

Is “not largely” restricting rights like being a little bit pregnant?

The current is either on or off. How much current there is does not alter that.

Nor does equivocation. Because once you flip that switch, you allow for turning the dial.

[Via Michael G]

You Keep Using That Lie…

@mandypatinktok

@zohrankmamdani is a deeply thoughtful human being and we think he would make the best NYC mayor imaginable. We feel this as New Yorkers, as Jews and as human beings who are desperate for kindness, compassion and empathy to be represented in our politics. If you believe in him too join the effort to GET OUT THE VOTE at the link in our bio. @Zohran Mamdani #zohran #election #zohranformayor

♬ original sound – Mandy Patinkin and Kathryn G

…and eventually, if we’re really thinkin’, our nation and the world.

World domination… where have we heard that before? Besides, what do communists, who intend to burn the entire Constitution, care about Article II, Section 1, Clause 5?

What do we expect from someone who portrayed Che as a conscience and moral counterpoint to Evita?

Speaking of being “part of the problem“…

And yes, of course that’s part of the plan:

I guess rich useful idiots can afford to be commies. At least until their usefulness is ended.

Related UPDATE

‘You’ll Pray for Death’: Gun-Control Enthusiast Zohran Mamdani Brandished Handgun in 2016 Music Video [More]

Believe him:

The New Democrats

Zohran Mamdani is putting on a masterclass on how the Democrats win [More]

David Hogg was ahead of that curve and we know what he wants.

If you vote Democrat you are an enabler of communists bent on destroying America, disarming your countrymen and reveling in the deaths of all who are not fellow travelers. If you don’t believe the threat is existential and won’t help eliminate it, you’re worse than a useful idiot — you’re a useless one.

And just in case you were wondering why rich leftist female “celebrities” like Jennifer Welch or the hags from The View are a thing…

And I see my “woke” damn spell check is at it again:

Speaking of Using Full Might

But…but…but the memorandum…

It’ll be interesting to see how this gets spun as a good thing…

Verified by MonsterInsights