Double Vision

Trump’s vision for America: Guns everywhere, for anyone, with no questions asked. [More]

As opposed to Everytown’s vision, guns nowhere, for no one but the enforcers, no questions asked.

It does nothing to legalize “prohibited persons,” and if the law is ever followed, what’s the problem?

Notice the dusting off of the old “Chicago to Cheyenne” lie?

And using the “authoritative narrator’s” example (who is that impotent fool, anyway?), how many Montana ranchers have gone on a Big Apple shooting spree?

[Via Jess]

What’s in an Aptronym?

Under the headline, “‘Brain flaws’: Understanding MAGA as an epidemic disease” and the subheadline, “Epidemiologist Dr. Gary Slutkin: MAGA is a ‘dangerous and lethal syndrome’ of ‘Authoritarian Violence Disorder,’” we are told Slutkin is “a distinguished epidemiologist, formerly with the World Health Organization.” And under the guise of stopping violence, he fires off this Nazi-style propaganda to inspire violence against Trump and his “diseased” supporters. [More]

That sounds libelous. Hey, it’s Salon

It also sounds like a good reason for a medical board complaint to so label citizens one politically opposes.

Funny, what was once considered a psychiatric disorder and what’s considered on now. The whole thing seems pretty Soviet…

[Via bondmen]

Isaiah 5:20 Writ Large

Election Flyer from Chicago Area Catholic Parish Pushes Radical Leftist Policies – Including Global Warming and Gun Control [More]

Put out by godless communist Democrats screaming about Republicans wanting a theocracy, no doubt.

10 to one Snuffy knows who’s behind it.

Marxist “social justice” trumps innocent human life…

The contortions a Catholic must have to go through to swallow this swill…

[Via Michael G]

So Much for Holding These Truths to Be Self-Evident…

The Supreme Court on Tuesday sent a challenge to a Pennsylvania law barring people 18- to 20-years-old from carrying guns back to the lower courts for another look in light of last term’s decision in United States v. Rahimi, in which the justices attempted to provide guidance for courts reviewing Second Amendment challenges to restrictions on gun rights. [More]

I know the wheels of justice grind slowly and we have procedures for a reason, but come on...

[Via Jess]

Commonsense Speech Safety Laws

Biden’s executive order targets modern manufacturing processes in ways that implicate the First Amendment. [More]

So if Democrats want to ban “misinformation” and now real information, what kind of information will still be “legal”?

The good thing is, the First Amendment says “Congress shall make no law…”

They’re not making it. The executive is!

Numbkrull

“People like me who like to hunt and who love guns, it’s sad almost to watch them get cut up,” said volunteer Dan Krull. “But we are going to support this sort of thing because it is symbolic and sends a message like, ‘Look we need to do something.’” [More]

You’re a real genius, aren’t you, gunkapo Fudd Dan?

So: Who was the FFL who processed the transfers?

Or was this another one of these?

[Via Steve T]

A Safe Seat Democrat

The face diapers work as well as his “gun laws.” How’d they let the one guy in without one?

Let’s be clear. Allowing Trump to hold an event at MSG is equivalent to the infamous Nazis rally at Madison Square Garden on February 20, 1939 [More]

That may be you he’s talking about.

Solid blue district Democrats don’t even try to hide their Antifa affinities.

Or that they want your guns.

Rochester First: News You Can Wipe With

New gun safety legislation signed into law [More]

Great narrative talking point PR release masked as “news,” “real reporter” Jamie Deline! And nice trick burying the tepid non-rebuttal at the very end to make it seem like both sides weighed in.

Well, you can pay the rent this month, but I really didn’t see anything here that Gemini or Chat GPT couldn’t do cheaper.

Mayor’s Assassination Shows Mexican Government Can Only Operate with Consent of Cartels

Mexican prohibitionists ignoring the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act to effect U.S. citizen disarmament are creatures that can only operate at the behest of cartel monsters who decapitate to terrorize. [More]

Who thinks the Framers included the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights so that animals from a failed narco-terrorist state abetted by treasonous domestic subversives could render it toothless through lawfare?

The Case for Tough International Arms Control

Academia.edu reposts a 2003 OXFAM report for some damn reason. [More]

Longtimers will remember we had some fun with OXFAM a while back.

Allow me to make a briefer case AGAINST tough international arms control:

No. Your move.

And I always crack a smile when I see these pop up:

If the dean who threatened to expel me unless I shaped up could see me now…

No. She Can’t. Not in This Context. She’s Not a Gunsmith.

Based on results, ATF can’t, either.

She’s just wondering if “ghost guns” can also fire 800 rounds a second.

It’s OK to say “she,” isn’t it?

Verified by MonsterInsights