ATF Statement in Rare Breed Trigger Litigation Raises Questions on Legal Authority

ChatGPT ATF Triggers Inspection 1536x864

“Please show me anywhere in the U.S.C. or C.F.R. that rate of fire is regulated in any way? Only method of fire is regulated. If it fires more than once per function of the trigger it’s highly regulated. If not, there is NO regulation.” [More]

Just because they act like they have the power to do something doesn’t mean they actually do.

The Fifth Column

Talaricogiffords

“I am so thankful that you asked this question, and also thankful that young activists have really drawn the link between climate change and white supremacy and capitalism in our country,” Talarico said. “And I think only ending the ways that all three of those oppressive systems work together, are we going to be able to begin the process of dismantling them.” [More]

That endorsement is looking more and more like treason, especially if you dig a bit deeper. Anybody who thinks our guns are all they want is a criminally negligent citizenship malpractitioner.

What’s the word…? “Submit“…?

[Via Sweet Babboo]

Sacrificial Lambs

“We have a moral imperative to place the needs of the world above even our own self-interest and, yes, even our own survival,” Nessel told attendees. [More]

So… does that mean she’s calling for Palestinian State?

And deleting “Never” but leaving “Again”…?

Whatever, Dana. You and your useful idiot followers reenacting Masada is your choice.

Just leave the rest of us out of it.

[Via Michael G]

On a High Note…

Hemani did not rule out Section 922(g)(3) charges when the government presents additional evidence that a defendant poses a danger to public safety. But prior to Hemani, prosecutors typically did not do that. The question now is how federal courts should deal with such prior convictions: Should they simply be vacated, or should the government get another chance to offer evidence that would meet Hemani’s new requirements? [More]

I’m all for punishing the hell out of people who make the choice to misoperate a firearm, or car, or anything while intoxicated and then threaten and/or harm the innocent. But how stoned do you have to be to believe abridging a fundamental right and imposing a permanent prior restraint because someone MIGHT temporarily do something bad is consistent with Founding intent?

[Via Lane]

My Kind of Razzmatazz

Ammo

Chicago has a higher homicide rate than comparably large cities. Of the 11 most populous U.S. cities (over 1 million people), Chicago consistently has the highest homicide rate. [More]

Forget it, Jake…

Related UPDATE

Chicago police face staffing crisis amid surge in weekend violence [More]

Now that’s “environmental justice“!

Take it away, Chuck:

Brown-Nosers

Brown releases review on mass shooting, action plan; says it’s unlikely it could have been prevented [More]

Not without anybody able to shoot back it couldn’t have been…

Unfortunately, proximate cause, tort claims immunities for government schools, and sensitive places doctrine mean lawsuits for damages attributable to forced disarmament aren’t likely to go anywhere.

[Via Edmund M]

The FuddVoters Candidate

El-Sayed Dodges Twice on if He Wants to Replace 2nd Amendment Before Saying He’s Okay With Hunting Rifles [More]

For hunting tyrants and domestic enemies…?

Besides, we already have “a right to healthcare.”

We just don’t have a right to force someone else to provide it for us– that’s called slavery.

[Via bondmen]

A ‘Pro-Gun Democrat’

In a 2016 interview, Latin Grammy Award-winning artist and Democratic congressional candidate Bobby Pulido defended a fellow singer against criticism for a graphic music video that depicted acts of sexual violence and murder. In the video production of “Fuiste Mía” or “You were mine” by Gerardo Ortiz, a singer walks in on his girlfriend cheating on him. After shooting her lover, he then handcuffs her to a pole, blindfolds her, and gropes her before putting her in the trunk of his car and setting it on fire. [More]

Hey, what’s the big deal? He’s “one of us” isn’t he?

That must be why he embraces this guy:

If shooting guns were the only criteria, we’d have no better pal than Lon Horiuchi.

Based on who else they help attain political power, there ARE no “Pro-Second Amendment” Democrats.

Which makes me wonder what the hell NRA is doing endorsing one after she had come out for Joe Biden. Have they learned nothing with Kirsten Gillibrand? John Dingell? Hary Reid? Jon Tester? Bart Stupak…?