Narrative Parroting Helps ‘Reasonable’ Tennessee Gun-grabbers Influence the Ignorant

Great. Well heeled Vichycons and Fudds are on board with throwing the rest of us under the bus. So, what’s new? [More]

The string pulling violence monopolists can always count on useful idiots, “real reporters,” and gunkapos (but I repeat myself) to do their bidding.

Character Study

Gun Rights Groups Losing Their Damn Minds Over New Magazine Limit Bill [More]

Here’s a person who doesn’t have a clue as to what 2A is about resorting to Alinsky Rule 5 ridicule under cover of a pen name to shield from personal accountability for being so ignorant…

What is it we know about trolls?

WarOnGuns Correspondent Tacticool Memes tried to inject some reality into a BlueSky echo chamber denizen’s absurd self-contradictions about the bill and got promptly blocked for his effort:

So much for demanding an “actual conversation.”

There are too many useful idiots rejecting truth to spend precious time trying to deprogam them.

A Sporting Chance

The bill would allow the import of firearms when similar products are domestically produced and available for sale in the United States. [More]

I wonder if he reads Firearms News. The thing is, it doesn’t need to be a bill, which would allow for it to fail. :

There’s something else Trump could do quickly that would not require Congressional approval. Back in 1989, George H.W. Bush (the “Read my lips, no new gun laws” president who quit the NRA over its then-Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre repeating Democrat Rep. John Dingell’s “jackbooted thugs” reference to ATF) imposed “a permanent import ban on 43 types of semiautomatic assault rifles, including the Chinese-made AK47 and Israeli-made Uzi carbine,” per The Washington Post. The excuse given was they “were not being used for sport as required by the Gun Control Act of 1968.”

That would be “very easy” to overturn, Firearms News Editor-in Chief, Vincent L. DeNiro, who has a nine-page resume in the gun industry going back to 1982, assesses. “President Trump doesn’t even need Congress to get rid of the unconstitutional 1989 “assault weapons” import ban, he just needs to order the BATFE to declare all imported semi-auto rifles as ‘sporting,’ which is what these same models are considered when domestically produced.” (True, “sporting use” is a term originated in a 1938 German gun control law, and “swords and every terrible implement of the soldier are the birthright of an American,” but it will get the job done and we know why we want them.)

[Via bondmen]

Button, Button, Who’s Got the Button?

SIG SAUER Recalls ROMEO5 Red Dot Firearm Sights Due to Ingestion Hazard; Violations of Reese’s Law Federal Safety Regulations for Consumer Products with Button Cell Batteries and Child Resistant Button Cell Battery Packaging [More]

Here’s the takeaway:

Incidents/Injuries:
None reported

So unlected, embedded, probable Democrat bureaucrats get to impose an expensive “F*** you” over a non-existent problem, unless you’re in the habit of leaving your guns so equipped in reach of toddlers…

You gotta wonder if they invented this on their own or if the antis have figured out how they can snitch and stick it to gun companies with rulefare.

What was that about teddy bears again…?

I’m wondering if a FOIA request might shed some light, and who would be the best person/entity to file one… I’m also wondering if this type of destructive overreach is something the new administraiton can address.

Too bad Gun Owners for Trump isn’t an actual thing…

[Via Jess]

The Stop Fraudulent Tax-Funded Anti-Gun Propaganda Act

Medicaid funding for gun violence programs faces scrutiny – Republican Congressman Andrew Clyde, of Georgia, unveiled the Medicaid Funds Integrity Act to restrict Medicaid funds for gun violence prevention programs. [More]

As usual, the “real reporters” are parroting lies to us. The point is to stop using tax dollars to spread violence monopolist propaganda, just like CDC was doing when its Director of the National Center for Injury Control and Prevention publicly advocated “We need to revolutionize the way we look at guns, like what we did with cigarettes. Now it [sic] is dirty, deadly, and banned.”

Will it get a vote this time?

[Via Jess]

For Evers and Evers

Gov. Evers creates new violence-prevention office in wake of school shooting [More]

Guaranteed not to prevent one instance of violence because it will be comprised entirely of people who oppose the only proven deterrent…

It’s revealing, how he lies and says citizen disarmament that will bolster a violence monopoly, a blatantly political move, should “transcend politics.”

That and “Violence is a statewide problem” without telling us how many WI communities has zero murders

Ah well, his blood dance got him publicity with stupid Democrat voters who believe he’s “doing something,” which is what this is all about.

[Via Mike F]

President Trump Can Lead in Fight Against State-Level 2nd Amendment Infringements

“What are you going to do about it, President Trump?” [More]

First, we neeed to realistically look at what he CAN do. Then we need to realistically look at what he WILL do and use every means at our disposal to get his ear and try to keep him on course.

Putting the Wild in Wildfires

Animals fleeing the California fires are seeking refuge in residential areas, having been displaced from their natural habitats in the mountains and hills. [More]

Then thank goodness for Giffords “trailblazers”!

[Via Edmund M]

Tangentially-Related UPDATE

Those aren’t the only predators.

Seems as plausible an explanation as any…

[Via WiscoDave]

Speaking of Vichycon Swine…

Multiple Republicans voted for gun confiscations without due process in HB-4144 [More]

Until gun owners let the GOP know they cannot betray us and win, this will continue. They need uncompromising gun owners more than uncompromising gun owners need them.

So does that mean I’d rather let a really, really anti-gun Democrat win the seat instead?

Does that mean you’d surrender your guns if they did?

Senate Should Demand Unequivocal Answers from Bondi on Second Amendment

I believe in asking political candidates and nominees specific questions that demand unequivocal answers… [More]

Or they could just give her a pass for “I believe in the Second Amendment BUT…”

Verified by MonsterInsights