Notes from the Resistance
My husband was killed in a ‘gun free zone.’ Arm teachers for safety and to save lives [More]
I’d say “train teachers.” And get out of the way of them arming themselves.
I did note one loudmouthed self-identified Marxist punk saying it would “turn schools into war zones.” If I could remember where, I’d link to it.
No surprise he prefers them to remain killing fields…
[Via Michael G]
Someone does not need a license to carry, according to the law, “in his place of abode or fixed place of business.” Yakaitis owned the home Powanda attempted to burglarize. The catch: He didn’t live there—it reportedly had no tenants at the time of the crime—opening a window for law enforcement to charge him essentially on a technicality. [More]
It’s awful hard to make the swine harassing him live in infamy if we’re not told his name.
[Via Michael G]
Indiana Prosecutor Laments That Self-Defense Laws Exist, Protect Defensive Gun Users [More]
A quote from L. Neil Smith comes to mind.
[Via Michael G]
This time, however, the store employee responded by drawing a firearm in self-defense, leading to a standoff that ended with Cook’s arrest as police arrived minutes later. [More]
On drugs? IQ 0f 60? Both?
As for the tolerant clerk, he’s further proof that moral people use the amount of deterrence necessary to stop aggression. Working nights because that’s what’s needed and having to deal with aggressive parasites, he showed admirable consistency of principles regardless.
No wonder lying communists call such people Concealed Carry Killers!
[Via Keith B]
“I said [at the press conference] if you shoot accurately, and you kill the guy, you save taxpayers money. And I also said that if somebody gets killed during a home invasion, the odds of them re-offending are zero. And we like those odds, which we do,” he told Fox News Digital. [More]
Still, even if you live in Santa Rosa County, the sheriff’s public sentiments notwithstanding, remember one thing when his deputies respond.
[Via Jess]
Notable things going on in this video from Arlington Texas:
-robbers have weapon lights
-robbers have standard capacity drum mags
-robbers flee when faced with superior firepower [More]
Hey, if you need more than three shots against armed robbers you have no business defending yourself!
[Via WiscoDave]
Chiefs’ Harrison Butker calls Super Bowl parade shooting ‘degenerative violence,’ calls on men to step up [More]
Explaining how would be nice.
And why we should…
[Via Jess]
A new controversial armed citizen patrol has launched in Hartford. Organizers say the people will be legally carrying as they walk around parts of the city where violence has taken a toll… They were part of Minister Cornell Lewis’ Self-Defense Brigade. [More]
So… how do they vote?
That white broad must be a real piece of work.
[Via Jess]
So, take the doorstop and let the criminals (freelance and official) rule the night because, as Constable Marco reminds us, “A lot of them that they’re arresting have guns on them. And they’re not toy guns, they’re real guns. They’re loaded.” [More]
Just give them what they want? What if what they want is you?
“When seconds count, police are minutes away” takes over, and the only rational and effective “Action Plan” is “Stop the Threat.” [More]
If you’re going to listen to bureaucrats on keeping safe from animal attacks, you might as well just put on a crash helmet and roller skates, and strap an Acme Rocket to your back.
A Clark County man was entitled to argue self-defense when he intentionally shot toward a person, and was not required to show he intended to kill or harm the man who threatened him, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today. [More]
While I don’t recommend warning shots, there’s no one-size-fits-all, it worked, and no one was hurt or killed. If history, text, and tradition are the new standards, there’s gotta be a place for “shot across the bow.”
Inducing someone you don’t know to “back off” seems a perfectly legitimate reason for self defense, especially considering what could have happened.
It’s interesting that the three judges against the self-defense claim were Republicans, with three Democrats and one Republican ruling in the citizen’s favor.
[Via JG]
Four victims turn gun on suspect in Bourbon Street armed robbery [More]
In fairness, they probably hadn’t heard that they could have their own yet…
Then again, they were on Bourbon Street…
Lemme guess: They surrendered it to the “Only Ones.”
[Via bondmen]
A violent altercation overnight at a south St. Louis QuikTrip ends with a security guard shooting and killing a suspect after police say the suspect shot the guard. [More]
It feels like there’s more to this story, and the question of a retention holder seems like one corporate risk management should want to look into. I’m sure homicide is looking over the security footage to see how it all went down.
[Via bondmen]
Man killed trying to defend home during alleged invasion: North Carolina authorities [More]
It sounds like they all could have died, plus he took down one of the invaders who will give up the other two.
No one claims gun defenses totally succeed all the time. They do, however, allow for a choice and a chance, which the alternative does not.
[Via bondmen]
