Notes from the Resistance
A sensational report in The Wall Street Journal implies that questioning the integrity of our elections is tantamount to domestic terrorism. [More]
Never let a “greatest threat” meme go to waste.
Everybody knows that the “conservative” WSJ is ultimately controlled by Rupert Murdoch & Son…?
[Via bondmen]
She even cackles like a ghoul.
Michigan Official Estimates Presidential Results Will Come Day After Election Day [More]
Good thing concerns are baseless.
[Via Michael G]
GOP challenger in key House race blasts Dem opponent’s explanation on ethics complaint [More]
Here’s all the “ethics” we need to see from the oath-breaking son of a b!+ch and the useful idiots who support him.
And here’s a reason gun owners should vote for Sonza and not just against Landsman.
DHS Warns Law Enforcement Election Deniers May Attempt to Bomb Drop Boxes [More]
And the beauty of it is, while “the greatest threat” will be blamed, you won’t be able to tell whose side they’re really on.
Funny, they don’t tell us who the “analysts” are who are “corroborating” the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, a “left-of-center advocacy organization co-founded in 2020 by two former high-level Southern Poverty Law Center employees.”
Everybody knows Wired is ultimately controlled by the same billionaire who profits from Teen Vogue’s anal sex tips for teens…?
So much for Republicans being the “party of the rich” and Democrats being the “party of the common man.” [More]
The goal is to rule the common man, not to champion him. If they have to do that by setting up someone they consider a rube to pander to the Fudds, so be it.
With respect, could you explain your gun control policy to the parents of the victims of school shootings? [More]
Do a page search for “Second Amendment” or go to 40:17 in the video:
A Fulton County judge on Wednesday decided that seven election rules passed by the Georgia State Election Board are “illegal” and declared them invalid. [More]
Suddenly it makes perfect sense.
Everyone sees we’re way past happenstance and coincidence, right?
And enemy inaction is just as deadly.
[Via Michael G]
Kamala Harris Is Priming Democrats For Violent Resistance If Trump Wins [More]
Well, yeah. These people are all about projection.
[Via bondmen]
I imagine this is a fair depiction of the mental acuity of Kamala voters who find this inspirational.
[More]
What an avatar for the party of the workin’ man…
Plus nine other multi-billionaire One Percenters that for some reason are immune to Antifa attacks…
If you’re a Montanan, are you helping Tim Sheehy help you?
Nearly three months after Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose first sought access to federal citizenship verification records to help the Buckeye State ensure noncitizens don’t vote in the election, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has yet to respond. [More]
Just call Frank a xenophobic white Christian Nationalist conspiracy theorist Nazi and that’ll be good enough for Democrat voters.
[Via Michael G]
FBI Stealth Edits Crime Stats, Shows Violent Crime Went Up in 2022 [More]
How can you tell Chris Wray is lying?
[Via Michael G]
What does it say about opponents when all they reply with are ad hominem attacks and inane, cognitively dissonant declarations like “All of you who are crying for Voter IDs… it is nothing more than a PLOY for Maga and Trump to claim ‘VOTER FRAUD’ after Kamala Harris has won the election LEGITIMATELY.”
Last night, I was given a statement from the victim of Tim Walz to release this morning. [More]
Vs.
Anyone blindly believing this, is retarded. [More]
I agree.
What about people who blindly discourage investigating such a serious criminal accusation leveled against a powerful politician?
It’s no secret I could not be more against Walz. I think if he and Kamala are elected it’s an existential threat to peaceable means of redress for Second Amendment advocates. With that being said, I thought Community Notes existed for just such posts as these.
I understand not dignifying a “Have you stopped beating your wife?” loaded question and helping draw attention to it. Still, this has the potential to impact election results, and if I don’t object to them doing this to Walz I can’t object to them doing this to anyone, including me.
As a proponent of “Red Flag Laws,” Walz is all for you and me having to prove OUR innocence if accused of something the government will disarm us over without being convicted of anything. But that still doesn’t make it right for anyone to demand he prove HIS innocence: The burden of proving guilt is on the state.
FEC and DOJ should be the ones investigating this. If it turns out to be a malicious lie being spread in an attempt at election interference, that’s prosecutable, especially if more than one person is involved. So is if the accusations turn out to have substance.
If you see something say something, right?
DOJ Sues Virginia for Purging Voter Rolls Too Close to Election [More]
I thought I’d already posted on this and was going nuts because I couldn’t find it and then found they’d also just done it in Alabama…
[Via Michael G]
[More]
There ARE no pro-Second Amendment Democrats.
Even NRA isn’t fooled by that Walzian fraud:
[Via Andy M]
‘Totally illegal’: Trump escalates rhetoric on outlawing political dissent and criticism [More]
That’s not what he said at all.
Who do these people think they are? Ian Millheiser?
ASU under fire after Harris campaign accesses data to text 70,000 students… “We’re going to be submitting a [Freedom of Information Act] request very soon to understand how that information was supposedly public,” Carpenter said. [More]
The election will be over by then, and if all goes as planned, guess who will be in charge of doing something about this…
How about if you see something say something, for all the good that’ll do?
[Via Michael G]
Even if Trump can win the election with 270 or more Electoral College votes, likely as of now, the fight will not be over. The Democrats have another lawfare trick up their sleeves. If Democrats retake the House of Representatives, then on Jan. 6, 2025, the New Democrat-controlled House could pass a resolution that Trump is an “insurrectionist” and disqualify his electoral votes under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. [More]
[Via bondmen]
