Category: Election Integrity

No Reason We Can’t Have Both

Well, there is ONE reason: Democrats.

I should have said no Constitutionally valid reason.

The Old One-Two

Here’s the jab.

And here’s the punch:

Dems gotta be stunned…

I’d say things got significantly more dangerous for Trump, especially if it uncovers suppressed evidence leading to why the J6ers believed all those claims we’ve been assured were “baseless.”

[Via Michael G]

A Senior Moment

From yesterday’s Bondi hearings what became abundantly clear is Democrats don’t want DOJ looking into their shenanigans.

I wonder what political connections and communications will emerge…

[Via Michael G]

Adventures in Baselessness

Let’s hope this gets Mike Lindell out of bankruptcy and allows him to smother some deserving souls with HisPillow.

Then let’s hope an honest investigation reveals what most of us have had plenty of cause to suspect, with the attendant repercussion on laws and appointments enacted over the last four years.

It Depends Upon What the Meaning of the Word ‘Bipartisan’ Is

“In 2000, before the general election, I introduced a bipartisan resolution to amend the Constitution and abolish the Electoral College.” [More]

How could it have been “bipartisan” if the only co-sponsor was a Democrat and it was never voted on?

Lest Ye Be Judged

AZ Judge Recuses Himself From ‘Fake Electors’ Case After Emails Surface Demanding Judges Defend Kamala [More]

The real scandal here is that emails had to “surface.”

I will say that bit about Kamala being “promiscuous with generals in the Situation Room” would probably make for a pretty lucrative porno movie.

[Via Michael G]

‘Our Democracy’

The left wants to get rid of this system not for democracy’s sake, but so it can turn the U.S. into something it was never meant to be: A country where states don’t matter and an all-powerful central government, unencumbered by constitutional limits, has control of every aspect of our lives. [More]

The only time they scream about “home rule” is when they want to undermine preemption on guns.

[Via bondmen]

Poll Positions

Top Leftist Online Pundits Are Reportedly Hemorrhaging Subscribers Following Kamala’s Decisive Defeat [More]

My favorite pompous dolt was YouGov’s Paul Smith, who smugly predicted:

We think Kamala Harris will firstly, uh, win the popular vote by millions, but more importantly, the Electoral College 0:… we think the most likely result is that she’ll win 292 Electoral College votes to 246 for Donald Trump.

If we really want to talk about a “Pollster’s Brave Call,” Mark Walters of Armed American Radio has made no bones about declaring and defending “312” and the popular vote for for Trump in the weeks leading up to the election.

[Via bondmen]

Verified by MonsterInsights