Now THERE’S a Name I Recognize!

[More]

True, it doesn’t prove anything, but if I were to use the standard prohibitionist practice of conflating correlation with causation, I’d figure there’s probably a reason the “malevolent dwarf” doesn’t want traditional American adults to be armed.

Hey: Who believes Bondi, Bongino and Patel?

[Via Doc S]

Who’s Infringin’? We’re Confiscatin’

The US Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, has ruled in a case involving a Sheriff’s Department which confiscated 14 guns and has refused to return them to the alleged owners. [Watch]

Jojo Krako comes to mind.

I’m assuming the claimants did not obtain their firearms through an FFL.

So, if you bought your guns through private sales and you don’t register them with the state, you’re effectively presumed “guilty” until you can prove your “innocence”…? It’s not up to the Only Ones who took them from your home to prove they’re not yours…? And it’s not like the value of the guns is worth a protracted series of battles through the courts.

If I had any guns I bought, say, back in 1977 from a co-worker whose last name I can’t even remember anymore and who may be long dead for all I know, they could take them from me if a guest acted up. The only reasons that could never happen is I don’t know any cowardly bullies with anger management problems and would never allow them in my house if I did, plus, as we’ve long established, I would never own a gun — evil, nasty things things always going around killing people…

[Via Jess]

Musk’s ‘America Party’ Long on Exploiting Disgruntlement, Short on Specifics for Gun Owners

It’s doesn’t look like Musk’s America Party will provide the safe haven to jump to that some gun owners are knee-jerk responding to… [More]

What ship will angry gun owners be jumping to?

TDS Writ Large

The newest leftwing conspiracy is that Trump is throwing migrants off planes into the ocean. For real. [More]

You can’t reason with crazy people. All you can do is restrain or repel them.

What culpability should the platform owners share when other lunatics act on lying delusions they host for profit?

[Via bondmen]

The Rest of the Story?

Funny…

I look at the Google News feed for the search term ICE ALVARADO ATTACK and none of the ‘Authorized Journalist” reports mention this:

So, are we dealing with lies or with lies of omission? And if the latter, why?

[Via WiscoDave]

A Win– For Now

A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has unanimously upheld an earlier preliminary injunction against a section of the California Business & Professional Code which had been used by the state to stifle gun-related advertising in Junior Sports magazine, in a case brought by the Second Amendment Foundation and others. [More]

Now we see if the en banc court reverses that.

Welcome to California, where advertising a “swell vacation gift from Dad” is verboten and LGBTQ affirming picture books for kids are mandatory.

And May Posterity Forget That Ye Were Our Countryman

We’d share sidewalks with grim-faced men leading their bears by a leash. Stores would have signs reminding patrons not to bring bears inside. Those that didn’t would have many frightened customers trying to evade the enormous beast blocking the aisles. Of course, this would be normalized like any other male paranoia. [More]

It sure sounds like “Authorized Journalist” Brian Lyman knows a thing or two about male paranoia. Doesn’t take much to get his Rapex to pop out, does it?

Right. The problem is America has too much freedom.

“Freedom to kill.” So in additon to being a pu$$y, he’s a liar.

And the Gersh Kuntzman Award goes to…

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights