Donald Trump Can Rein in Army Corps of Engineers on Guns

These lands belong to the people, and the people have the right to keep and bear arms. [More]

As Commander-in-Chief, this would be an easy and very popular fix with gun owners. Republicans facing midterms and “gun rights” groups take note how this would benefit you and get behind this now.

Lather, Rinse, Repeat

Democratic lawmakers propose campus gun ban to improve safety at Wisconsin colleges [More]

Because nothing says “No Predators Allowed” like Gun-Free Zones!

I don’t suppose Wisconsin Democrats would also require these and have the Party indemnify schools found liable to pay out?

I guess we could ask Kelda

[Via Mike F]

Give ’em What They Want

And if what they want is you…?

At first I thought I’d posted on this already, but when I checked saw that was just a parroted talking point.

[Via WiscoDave]

We’re the Only Ones Self-Serving Enough

An officer should respect your right to legally carry — but what happens when he gets antsy and gets aggressive with you? In that moment, your heart’s racing, your hands are frozen, and you’re trying to decide if telling him you’re armed will calm him down or make things worse. [Watch]

Yeah, why don’t you consider his feelings for a change?

Right, George?

[Via Jess]

And Leave the Disarming to Us!

US appeals court reverses lower court, approves Illinois ban on carrying firearms on public transit [More]

No doubt when he commutes, Biden appointee Judge Joshua Kolar is “comfortably situated” in a private luxury vehicle and doesn’t need submit himself and his loved ones to this.

[Via Jess]

With Republicans Like These…

Why Has Fort Worth – One of America’s Most Conservative Cities – Hired an Anti-Gun Police Chief? [More]

I’d start by looking at who “Republican” Mayor Mattie Parker joins with “to put aside partisan differences and pass common sense gun safety legislation.”

[Via Michael G]

‘Very Good News’?

[T]he 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has found that machine guns are not protected under the Second Amendment with really a terribly reasoned ruling. But the outcome is the one we want because, as I’ve explained to you before, unequivocally, 100% we 1,000% do not want a machine gun case to go to the United States Supreme Court. Anyone that disagrees with me is 1,000% wrong. If a machine gun case goes to the Supreme Court, we will 1,000% lose, which will create more bad Second Amendment precedent. And it will also delay, as an opportunity cost the decision that AR-15s and semi-automatic rifles are protected arms under the Second Amendment… [Watch]

The fact that his legal read on this is correct should be all the proof we need that the court benches are dominated by traitors.

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights