Category: Second Amendment

Act Now for Permitless Carry in NC

With the General Assembly’s May 4 “crossover deadline” looming, we need a hearing for House Bill 189 (“NC Constitutional Carry Act”) ASAP. If the bill doesn’t clear at least the NC House, it will be dead for the two year session, effectively meaning it can’t be re-introduced until 2025. You helped us pass SB 41. Now help us pass constitutional carry, eliminating the need for a governmental “permission slip” to exercise your Second Amendment rights. With recent passage in Florida, NC is now among a minority of states which have failed to pass constitutional carry. [More]

If you’re a North Carolina gun owner worth a damn you will sign the petition and contact the Republican leadership and Judiciary Committee members. GRNC couldn’t make it easier. If you’re a North Carolina gun owner NOT worth a damn, I doubt if you’re over here reading this.

I do have a nit to pick with my friends at GRNC: I reject the notion that “some gun rights advocates have objected to the lack of a training requirement.” If they do, that makes them gun CONTROL advocates. And you know how I feel about trainers who put the thin green line over principles.

Hitting the Ground Running

Responding quickly to the adoption of House Bill 1240 by the Washington Legislature and Gov. Jay Inslee signing it into law, the Second Amendment Foundation today filed a federal lawsuit challenging the new statute on Second and Fourteenth Amendment grounds, and is asking the court for preliminary and permanent injunctions. [More]

That and:

INSLEE’S TRAINING REQUIREMENT FOR GUN BUYERS SAME AS LITERACY TEST FOR VOTERS [More]

Tennessee Waltz

  • HB1583- requires an individual who resides in this state and owns a firearm to maintain liability insurance
  • HB1586- allows a law enforcement officer to petition for an extreme risk protection order
  • HB1587- prohibits the manufacture of semi-automatic rifles in this state
  • HB1588- prohibits the storage of a firearm or firearm ammunition in a motor vehicle
  • HB1589- prohibits the manufacture, transfer, or purchase in this state of a detachable firearm ammunition magazine that is capable of storing and feeding more than 10 rounds of ammunition
  • HB1591- creates an offense to store or keep a firearm in any place unless the firearm is secured in a locked container, unloaded, and separate from ammunition
  • HB1592- requires the owner of a firearm to report loss or theft of the firearm to law enforcement
  • HB1593- requires … that a sale or transfer of a firearm be done through a federally licensed gun dealer
  • HB1594- allows a court to issue an extreme risk protection order
  • HB1596- prohibits a gun dealer from delivering a firearm to a purchaser until 15 business days after

And after we get these, we’ll be back for more!

Thanks for showing a willingness to “compromise,” you “A”-rated treasonous Quisling.

[Via Jess]

Judge Contrarian

In the case of Hanson v. District of Columbia, in the District Court of the District of Columbia, on April 20, 2023, federal Judge Rudolf Contreras issued an opinion holding standard capacity magazines which hold more than ten rounds of ammunition are not protected under the rights which the Second Amendment was written to protect. [More]

This is the same robed Obama apparatchik who ruled against me and for Hunter Biden, so I guess I’m the one who’s “biased.”

“Confirmed by voice vote,” so all we really know is those “A”-rated Senate Republicans didn’t much care how their supporters would be treated…

A ‘Progressive’ Backfiring

This is what is happening to our family—once vigorously anti-firearm and now reluctantly in possession of one. [More]

Good– Democrat-enabled crime is waking people up to the reality that they’re on their own. But unless he’s physically incapacitated, you gotta wonder what kind of man relies on his wife to defend him.

[Via Jess]

We’re the Only Ones Armed Robbing Enough

New York citizen with 0 criminal record posts photos of a 3D printed AR lower on Reddit. NYPD (and presumably other agencies) magically have all of his credit card records and internet history within days showing “parts” purchases to complete the receivers. NYPD costume-wearing domestic terrorists in uniform show up and arrest the citizen. Seize over $22k worth of his property (including body armor claiming it was “firearm-related”). 6 months later all charges dropped. No items were returned. $10k+ in attorneys fees incurred. [More]

I’ll just leave this here…

[Via Jess]

Just as Happy to Stab You in the Front

“There is broad agreement that dangerous, unstable individuals who intend to harm themselves or others should not have access to weapons. We also share a strong commitment to preserving Second Amendment rights, ensuring due process and addressing the heart of the problem with strengthened mental health resources.” [More]

Keep digging, you lying sack.

[Via Jess]

Every Terrible Implement of the Soldier

Review: The History of Bans on Types of Arms Before 1900 [More]

In short, if the grabbers are looking for something from the Founding Era to support “historical context” to justify an “assault weapon” ban, they’re not going to find it.

It figures that the lame argument that no one considered the Second Amendment to be an individual right until recently proves to be the exact opposite of the truth. That’s because all the citizen disarmament zealots have are lies.

There’s a Simple Solution

Yet full-scale civil war is not the only danger. Far-right Americans are highly unlikely to coalesce into a cohesive force that could wage war, but an army is not required to wreak sustained havoc and destabilize the country. [More]

Imagine if, say, just Three Percent decided enough is enough.

It would seem the best way to keep that from happening would be to stop squeezing.

And One in the ‘Loss’ Column — For Now

Washington governor poised to sign massive ‘assault weapons’ ban, says it ‘will save lives’ – Bill will ban the sale and manufacture of dozens of semiautomatic rifles in Washington [More]

Because nothing says “security of a free State” like requiring the Militia of the whole people to engage a military threat with inferior armaments.

If SCOTUS doesn’t end up ruling such diktats unconstitutional, it’s game over for peaceful resolution outside of leaving the abusive “partner,” and that’s assuming the power-drunk headcase doesn’t resort to violence if that happens.

Funny, how we don’t call women who leave a relationship under such circumstances “seditionists.”

The Lottery Odds Loophole

Pro-gun conservatives continue to stress that most gun owners are responsible, reasonable and law-abiding. [More]

If we weren’t, you’d know it. This whole business of “He was a law-abiding citizen until he wasn’t” is just the way these liars try to swindle the thoughtless into accepting disarmament for everybody.

So it should be easy for them to prove it through a tough but fair licensing process.

Ditto for stupid DSM apparat-chicks!

And when they behave irresponsibly with a weapon that they know full well was designed to kill, then we must hold them fully accountable – including with criminal charges and serious jail time. Truly reasonable, responsible and law-abiding people would accept no less.

Yeah, no problem with that once suspects have been given full due process and found guilty. But every time we point to Soros prosecutors putting known predators back into the general population, her lot calls us “antisemites.”

And using “Boomers” to disparage individuals and disregard who they are solely because they fall within a larger group they had no control over is flat-out bigotry.

Right along with “white privilege” and other Marxist lies.

[Via Roger J]

The War on Guns

This bill would prohibit, commencing on January 1, 2027, a licensed firearms dealer from selling, offering for sale, exchanging, giving, transfering, or delivering a semiautomatic pistol, as defined, unless the pistol has been verified as a microstamping-enabled pistol. The bill would also prohibit a person from modifying a microstamping-enabled pistol or microstamping component with the intent to prevent the production of a microstamp. By creating new crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. [More]

Just in case Bonta wins…?

[Via Jess]