Truth Social Exclusion Another Example of Google Censoring ‘Bad Thinking’

Does anyone see Google “moderating threats of violence” when they come from a regime that’s implementing radical social changes being pushed by the global elites? Does everyone see the way cultural conquerors are doing the censorship job that the government cannot get away with (yet)? And is no one concerned that these alien-minded punishers of “wrong thinking” and gatekeepers of “right thinking” feel confident enough to publicly drop the mask and distance themselves from the “Don’t be evil” pledge they initially found helpful in gaining public trust (and political concessions on “content providing,” with content denial conveniently left unaddressed)? [More]

What’s the opposite of “Don’t be evil”?

We are Controlling Transmission

The New Civil Liberties Alliance, the Attorney General of Missouri, and the Attorney General of Louisiana, have filed a lawsuit that blows the lid off a sprawling federal censorship regime that will shock the conscience of Americans. The joint statement on discovery disputes in the lawsuit, State of Missouri ex rel. Schmitt, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., et al., reveals scores of federal officials across at least eleven federal agencies have secretly communicated with social-media platforms to censor and suppress private speech federal officials disfavor. This unlawful enterprise has been wildly successful. [More]

A Justice Department that wasn’t a prime violator would make this a top priority. That it won’t tells us much.

[Via Michael G]

We’re the Only Ones Foggy Enough

Police have used “Fog Reveal” to search hundreds of billions of records from 250 million mobile devices, and harnessed the data to create location analyses known among law enforcement as “patterns of life,” according to thousands of pages of records about the company. [More]

Add that to this and welcome to Surveillance Nation!

Hey, if you’re not doing anything wrong, you shouldn’t have anything to hide. Besides, what could go wrong?

Funny, how the economic fascist profiteers behind this keep a personal low profile… The VA State Corporation Commission wasn’t any help either.

[Via Jess]

Rope-a-Dope

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and Defense Distributed have teamed up to sue the State of California over its ban on CNC machines used for producing unserialized firearms and a law letting the State recover attorney fees from plaintiffs and their lawyers. [More]

You get the feeling that the state, with virtually unlimited resources, is forcing the gun groups to expend all of theirs on lawsuit after lawsuit, counting on exhausting and wearing them out until they’ve got nothing left to punch with.

[Via Jess]

Unconstitutional, But What the Hell…

DECISION AND ORDER that Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) is sua sponte DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3}. Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 9 ) is denied without prejudice as moot. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 21 ) is denied without prejudice as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this action. Signed by Chief District Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 8/31/2022. (sal ) (Entered: 08/31/2022) [More]

I found myself channeling Gary Coleman over this so found it advisable to post GOA’s latest email over at my WarOnGuns Placeholder blog because I don’t see it on their site yet.

[Via Jeremy C]

Where Credit is Due

Democrats send letter to company offering buy now, pay later firearms financing – Lawmakers told Credova Financial of Montana they are concerned its deferred-payment plans could potentially fuel gun violence. [More]

Legal businesses, legal practices, absolutely no tie-in with the criminal subculture enabled and propagated by collectivist diktats and controls…

The grabbers keep looking for a new way in.

Just once I’d like to see a CEO with the guts to tell these communist publicity whores to go f*** themselves in no uncertain terms.

[Via Jess]

Jojo Krako Permitting

Challenger to NJ’s unconstitutional law granted carry permit (kind of). [More]

So the “historical understanding” is that flintlock pistols were to be kept unloaded and locked in the back of the carriage and you could not have them where the “authorities” declared off-limits …?

Just like the old days…?

Who’s infringin’? We’re forbiddin’!

Verified by MonsterInsights