Category: Tyranny

The Devil in the Details

This technical change pushes “others” within the definition of “assault weapon” under Connecticut’s ban… While residents of other states are able to register these firearms with the ATF, or change the short barrels for longer ones to make them legal, the ATF has stated that it will not permit any such registrations from Connecticut residents due to Connecticut’s “assault weapon” ban. Nor will changing out the barrels avoid redesignation as banned “assault weapons” under Connecticut law. [More]

Damned if they did, damned if they didn’t.

The Re-Reenactment

A new rule in Pennsylvania that will require re-enactors of a 1763 battle to lay down their weapons is drawing fire from a local historical society, the latest skirmish in the re-enactment world, which has been diminishing as hobbyists get older and sensitivities about restaging historical events have grown. [More]

A plan comes together.

If I may make a suggestion:

Give ’em walkie talkies!

Never Mind, eh?

Canada’s Liberal government repealed on Friday elements of its gun-control legislation that proposed banning rifles and shotguns widely used by hunters, farmers and indigenous communities. The surprise decision emerged after the plan to target thousands of rifles and shotguns sparked widespread opposition from the governing Liberals’ political allies on gun control, indigenous leaders and gun-rights advocates. [More]

Somebody misjudged blowback.

Now that the pressure’s been relieved, look for the only group caring about further infringements to be the one they believe they can safely ignore.

[Via Jess]

As Told to Jojo Krako

An act to amend Sections 171b, 171d, 171.5, 171.7, 626.9, 25610, 25850, 26150, 26155, 26165, 26170, 26175, 26185, 26190, 26195, 26200, 26205, 26210, 26220, 26225, 29805, and 30370 of, to add Sections 25350, 26162, 26206, and 26230 to, and to repeal and add Section 26202 of, the Penal Code, relating to firearms. [More]

Who’s infringin’? We’re amendin’.

[Via Dan Gifford]

Any Person

“Any person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a fourth degree felony.” [More]

“Any person” would seem to include any person traversing the state on these interstates.

But don’t worry. Any person will be protected as a traverser. Maybe.

For this and other “concessions” on illegitimate claims against our birthrights “we” accepted the “voice vote” Hughes Amendment…?

Does any person doubt it will pass?

[H/T Henry]

UPDATE

Gun and Magazine Ban Bills Scheduled for Committee Hearings [More]

NMSSA says “It is absolutely imperative that gun owners speak out on these bills.”

‘Expert’ Explanation for Why California Still Has ‘Gun Violence’ Misses the Obvious

To paraphrase Democrat strategist James Carville’s slogan about the economy, it’s the criminals, stupid. [More]

They’re going after the wrong thing. Not that the useful idiots will notice.

Coming Soon, to a Vibrant Community Near You

I made this video at Puerto Limon in Darien Gap as this group emerged. Most are military aged males. Every day I am with them I see a sprinkling among the masses — a few who appear dangerously insane. And another sprinkling of obvious predatory males. This is true here in Darien, and the US/Mexico border. [More]

So… pro-gun Democrats…?

[Via Wynn A]

Just Like the Founders Intended

The Second Amendment Allows States To Implement Varied Firearm Regulations To Address Their Local Needs [More]

I kept reading through this trying in vain to find something, anything reflecting Founding intent to substantiate that claim.

Then again, I’ve been waiting for over 20 years for one of the lying grabbers to be able to do that.

Verified by MonsterInsights