Tag: Colorado

Character Study

Gun Rights Groups Losing Their Damn Minds Over New Magazine Limit Bill [More]

Here’s a person who doesn’t have a clue as to what 2A is about resorting to Alinsky Rule 5 ridicule under cover of a pen name to shield from personal accountability for being so ignorant…

What is it we know about trolls?

WarOnGuns Correspondent Tacticool Memes tried to inject some reality into a BlueSky echo chamber denizen’s absurd self-contradictions about the bill and got promptly blocked for his effort:

So much for demanding an “actual conversation.”

There are too many useful idiots rejecting truth to spend precious time trying to deprogam them.

From the People Who Would Benefit Politically from You Being Dead

SB25-003, Colorado’s newly filed “Assault Weapons” Semi-Auto Firearm bill will ban all rifles and shotguns that accept detachable magazines, along with many semi-auto pistols that accept detachable magazines. If enacted, the Colorado Attorney General would have the power and authority to further define the nuanced and often contradictory bill language. [More]

They’re just trying to help their goals along.

[Via cydl]

CO Democrats Selective in Which Rights They Shred

New Concealed Carry Law Takes Effect July 1 – Plus a Lib Bonus: Vehicle Weapons Now Must Be Locked Up [More]

I don’t suppose being forced to take an eight-hour course and pass a written exam to vote is in the cards…

Coloradans take note. You’ll find no more staunch defender of all rights from government abuses than Mr. Gramlich & Co.

You can subscribe for hard copy or online editions. It sure beats the DSM.

What Government Giveth…

This is the same smug @$$hole who deleted his X account after he called Trump a devil following the assassination attempt.

[Via cydl]

An Age-Old Question

However, state legislatures have the authority and prerogative, rooted in the Tenth Amendment, to set and adjust the age of majority as they see fit “for the public good”… [More]

This:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

does not override this:

This Constitution…shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

It’s so weird– young people in Marx for Our Lives demanding that the government curtail their rights because they’re not mature and responsible enough to claim them.

[Via Antigone]

‘Inadvertantly’ My… Eye

“This is not a security threat,” Colorado’s Democratic Secretary of State Jena Griswold told 9NEWS Tuesday…We have layers of security, and out of just an abundance of caution, have staff in the field changing passwords, looking at access logs and looking at the entire situation and continuing our investigation.” [More]

Now that we’ve been caught…

I’m trying to conceive of a situation where this could happen either by accident or incompetence.

[Via Michael G]

Masterpiece Theater

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Tuesday to dismiss a lawsuit brought by an attorney who’s been harassing cake artist Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, for more than 12 years. [More]

So it’s not “My life’s work my choice”?

You’ll notice who the cowards haven’t tried to sue.

What are the chances Phillips will be able to recover costs and damages?

What are the chances he won’t be targeted for more harassment?

[Via Michael G]

Bag of Tricks

Elisabeth Epps, Tim Hernández unseated as Democratic legislative primary results are a mixed bag for progressives [More]

Oh, yeah, Sean “Ban weapons of war that have no place on Colorado streets” Camacho and Cecilia “Regulate or ban the sale of assault weapons in Colorado” Espinoza are going to be GREAT improvements. Not.

I’m not getting how anyone could consider the election of more effective enemies a “win. “

[Via Jess]

Making the Federalists’ Argument Against a Bill of Rights for Them

“If you take ‘the people’ at the founding of the country, that means only white property owners have the right to bear arms,” McHugh said. In that case, McHugh pointed out, neither she nor Stevenson would be allowed to bear arms today. [More]

“Allowed…”?

Ah, the old “rights are granted” fraud. That this ignoranus is sitting on a federal bench is an obscene travesty.

And no one challenged her to show where in the Consitution it said the government was delegated the authority to disarm any free person?

[Via Jess]

The Impossible Dream

    “Firearm liability insurance” does not exist. By requiring consumers to obtain a product that isn’t available as a condition for legal gun ownership, this bill would essentially ban legal gun ownership by default. [More]

    That’s kind of the point.

    This reminds me of a story I heard years ago about discriminating against black voters in the Jim Crow (Democrat) South, where the sheriff kept a jar of beans at the polling place and administered an eligibility test to guess how many it contained if they wanted to vote.

    [Via cydl]

    Rocky Mountain Low

    In a late-night vote on Saturday, gun-grabbers in the Colorado House of Representatives passed three bills infringing on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. [More]

    Not that “insurance” (which they call “murder insurance” if you get it on your own) will cover actual murder, or that this isn’t just a plot to harass and close down dealers, or that the real sin isn’t coveting your countrymen’s rights…

    And, of course, it won’t affect this one bit, but then again, that’s never been the point.

    UPDATE

    Colorado Politics has more.

    [Via cydl]

    Verified by MonsterInsights