Notes from the Resistance
Federal judge upholds Colorado’s waiting period for firearm purchases [More]
So this Carter holdover dismissed Clayton Cramer’s fact-based analysis as “ad hominem” and went with the career prohibitionist, and said we need rights delayed because there might be drunks and it took time to manufacture guns back then…? What about if the gun was ready for sale?
What a subversive old fool.
[Via Jess]
Like geofence warrants, keyword warrants cast a dragnet that require a provider to search its entire reserve of user data—in this case, queries by one billion Google users. Police generally have no identified suspects; instead, the sole basis for the warrant is the officer’s hunch that the suspect might have searched for something in some way related to the crime. [More]
Ah, the old Inspector Clouseau theory of policing…
So what happens if you use Duck Duck Go?
[Via Michael G]
CO Democrat who laughed about dead Israeli babies tries BACKPEDALING and it goes REALLY wrong [More]
Naturally, he’s all about open borders and disarming you.
How else are you going to have a ‘FORCEFUL cultural revolution’ targeted at ‘whiteness’?
Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue.” And I have that on good authority.
My guess is his constituents agree with him.
[Via Michael G]
Starting in October, three blue states will put into effect a slew of new gun reform legislation. [More]
That Goldfinger… him plenty smart fella.
[Via Jess]
“It’s obvious the court is not on our side on a whole host of issues,” said Democratic Rep. Meg Froelich of Denver, co-chair of the legislature’s Gun Violence Prevention Caucus. But she said advocates for stricter gun laws at the statehouse aren’t going to slow down, in spite of legal challenges from Second Amendment advocates. [More]
Text, history, and tradition are not on your side. But you have unlimited tax plunder resources, and the only ones it costs are double-taxed gun owners…
[Via Jess]
A Marxist teacher from Colorado, who called for a “FORCEFUL Cultural Revolution” against “Whiteness,” was voted in by Democrats to fill an open state House of Representatives seat Saturday. [More]
Why does this surprise anyone? Democrats are communists.
The only ones who haven’t realized that are the useful idiots.
And the sleeping bourgeoisie.
[Via Michael G]
Colorado’s age limit for buying rifles will not increase to 21 anytime soon. A new law to raise the age limit was blocked — again — by federal judges on Tuesday. The decision from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals means that the 21-plus gun law will remain on hold as the larger court battle continues, perhaps for a year or longer. [More]
Get ’em while you can, young men.
And never give them up.
Funny, what the leftists call “kids.”
Until it’s time to vote or for puberty blockers.
[Via Jess]
Colorado governor seeks reversal of federal judge’s decision to block new law banning gun sales to anyone under 21 – Lawyers for Jared Polis last week asked Chief U.S. District Judge Philip Brimmer to postpone his preliminary injunction against the law until the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decides an appeal to the ruling [More]
I wonder if they’d feel mercy was due the other side if the situation were reversed…
[Via Jess]
Hundreds of White women gather at Colorado Capitol after plea from women of color to use their ‘privilege’ to demand action on gun violence [More]
They have no idea how privileged they are — and what it took to get them that way.
I’m with Magua on these regurgitating cud-chewers:
Magua understands that the white man is a dog to his women. When they are tired, he puts down his tomahawk to feed their laziness.
[Via Jess]
Related UPDATE
But no one’s talking about taking your guns:
That’s exactly what they’re talking about.
Thanks, Saira Rao, for leaving no doubt as to what it is you lunatics are demanding.
[Via cydl]
More than two-thirds of big-money, super PAC contributions supporting Mike Johnston for Denver mayor has come at the hands of just five people, and four of those are from outside Colorado — and all with ties to gun control or other “social justice” issues. [More]
It’s not like we didn’t see a slow fist coming:
In July, and again in December of 2013, this column warned — and has been a lonely voice raising the alarm in subsequent reports — that Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns had been establishing well-funded “action groups” in the various states as part of a committed strategy to impose New York-style “gun controls” throughout the land. The first report noted MAIG had already been at it for 10 months, yet information from the media, as well as from pro- and anti-gun groups, has been limited to nonexistent.
“Our side” needs to stop being so overwhelmingly reactionary and lay out adjustable plans for the long term. Just like the enemy does.
Moms group takes on gun reform, plans to ask the governor to ban guns [More]
And what can happen to moms and kids when a government that disarmed citizens are powerless to challenge does? [GRAPHIC and DISTURBING WARNING]
[Via Michael G]
Two of the new laws will raise the age to buy any firearm from 18 to 21 and install a three-day waiting period between the purchase and receipt of a gun. A third will strengthen the state’s red flag law, which allows a judge to temporarily remove someone’s gun if the person poses a threat to themselves or others. A fourth rolls back some legal protections for the firearm industry, exposing them to lawsuits from the victims of gun violence. [More]
They don’t care that it will take years and millions of dollars to challenge this under Bruen. They have unlimited tax plunder and by then, especially if that “pathway to citizenship” gets widened with speed lanes, who knows what SCOTUS will look like?
So which gun and ammunition manufacturers are going to0 tell the state to go **** itself?
[Via cydl]
Colorado gun control bills progress; semi-auto ban unlikely … The other gun-control proposals that have found broad Democratic support include strengthening red-flag laws, raising the firearm purchasing age to 21, opening the gun industry up to legal liability and installing a three-day waiting period after buying a gun. [More]
Just like the Founders intended!
[Via Jess]
UPDATE
David B. Kopel addresses the “many false and deceptive statements” the antis are using to try and swindle the citizenry out of its semiautos.
[Via cydl]
Democrats on Friday introduced a bill to ban so-called “assault weapons” in Colorado. Sponsored by Rep. Elisabeth Epps and Sen. Rhonda Fields, the bill “prohibits a person from manufacturing, importing, purchasing, selling, offering to sell, or transferring ownership of an assault weapon,” as well as rapid-fire trigger activators, according to the document. [More]
Who’s up for complying?
[Via cydl]
Why one popular gun control measure wasn’t part of Colorado Democrats’ reform package [More]
That’s OK– by swindling the public into viewing tyrannical infringements as “reforms,” it’s just a matter of time before the prohibitionists use the incremental position they’ll gain as the launching point for their next incursion.
[Via cydl]
Colorado gun buyers would have to wait 3 days before accessing their weapons under waiting-period proposal [More]
No worries. They don’t mean everybody.
Would I be canceled for wondering if there are any DREAMers in the bunch…?
[Via Michael G]
We at the Colorado State Shooting Association (the NRA’s state association) have obtained a draft copy of the transparently tyrannical “Assault Weapons Ban” that politicians are preparing to introduce in the Colorado State House… It’s as bad as you could possibly imagine. [More]
I dunno… I can imagine pretty bad, and with the lessons of history, who needs to?
But as long as we’re invited to imagine, I’d like to fantasize about how deliberately undermining that which is “necessary to the security of a free State” could be a capital offense.
Today, January 9th, the Colorado Legislature begins the 2023 legislative session. As in 2022, the Legislature can expect to see both pro and anti-gun bills introduced this year. Anti-gun lawmakers have drafted their gun control package bill, falsely titled the “Mass Shooting Prevention Act of 2023.” The draft bans many commonly used firearms Americans choose to defend themselves and their families with. Proponents, however, fail to explain how disarming law-abiding citizens will keep them safe from criminals who do not obey the law. Please use the link below to contact your legislators asking them to please vote NO on gun control. [More]
Yeah, that’ll be persuasive with subversive totalitarians who want to completely disarm and enslave you. Why not send them a picture of a limp d!ck so they really respect an alternative point of view?
Looks like this came out a couple of days too soon, but then again, adding more demands and restrictions is what the freedom haters are all about.
UPDATE
The bill defines assault weapons so broadly that it would ban almost all semi-automatic weapons. It would ban almost every handgun used in self-defense and concealed carry. It would ban almost every rifle used for home protection or competition shooting. No more Glocks, AR-15s, or shotguns with a magazine and those are just a few of the many guns this bill could ban. [More]
Yeah, I’ll be saying “please” to those evil m***********s.
UPDATE
Colorado Democrats aim to ban entire class of semi-automatic weapons [More]
It includes an embed of the bill.
[Via cydl]
FBI got earlier tip about Colorado Springs gay bar shooter [More]
Yeah, but do you have any idea how much work is involved in responding under current law while still observing due process considerations?
[Via Jess]
‘It was just anarchy. A rampage’: Victim recalls being attacked by more than a dozen teens on light rail train [More]
They look like privileged little white kids.
Carrying any weapon, dangerous instrument (including but not limited to switchblade knife, gravity knife, box cutter, straight razor, razor blade not wrapped or enclosed in a protective covering, or sword), or any other item intended for use as a weapon, except to the extent and in the manner authorized by law. Legal firearms may be carried if they are unloaded and carried in an enclosed container that completely conceals the item from view and identification as a weapon. This paragraph does not apply to law enforcement personnel or to persons to whom a concealed-carry license for such weapon has been duly issued and is in force.
But that said, forgive me if what I’m seeing reminds me more of this than anything. Did you see a one of them that looks like he could take a punch? I’m just wondering what a forceful response by a man who knows what he’s doing and who viciously takes out a couple right at the start might have on the appetite the rest of the young jackals for continuing to press forward.
And this business of protecting their identities because of their tender age is something their actions have forfeited.
[Via bondmen]
Colorado lawmakers explore potential changes to state’s red flag law in wake of Club Q shooting – Options could include expanding who can petition court to have guns removed [More]
And when that won’t work, the quest to expand it to include everybody not in the service of protecting the rulers and their functionaries will continue.
[Via bondmen]
Focus on the Family in Colorado vandalized with graffiti days after Club Q tragedy: ‘Blood is on your hands’ [More]
Because a godless self-loathing “non-binary” snapped at those he identified with…?
Tangentially-related UPDATES
Narrative Busted: Man Throwing Bricks At NYC Gay Bar Was Actually A Gay Man Enacting ‘Revenge,’ Police Say [More]
So would it be fair to say Focus on the Family has broken glass on its hands?
[Via Michael G]
And as long as I’m on the general topic:
San Francisco’s Guaranteed Income For Transgender People gives applicants 130 gender, sexual orientation and pronoun options to identify as… Under the GIFT program, 55 San Francisco residents who earn less than $600 monthly and identify as one of the many genders listed will receive $1,200 per month. [More]
Marxist wealth redistribution aside, dare I suggest there might be reasons they are incapable of earning $600/month? That and keep this up and there’s gonna be no room left on the 4473 for lying about drug use.
And talk about an “OK groomer” self-own…
[Via Michael G]
